Has Bob forwarded an email of this comment to the editor of the CM?

Good on you, Bob. All the best from Alan

Good on you Bob,
Just shows how guilty Gillard is, because if she wasn't she would have you in court quicker than one could blink.
Same as Pickering who has also called her a thief and criminal.
She knows full well that if she launches defamation actions the truth of her guilt will come out in court.
She is as guilty as sin and hopefully one day the truth will come out.
Keep at it, you will win out in the end.

Dear Bob, living up in FNQ we are an hour behind as you know. So having earlier read the Courier Mail's piece here earlier this afternoon and the many comments, I saw yours, but just thought it was a comment, here, not an actual letter to the CM. But you have done so, good on you. I have just listened to Michael somewhere in Melbourne thinking out loud about this piece of work by unamed staff writers. And have replied to him. What I think is they should be taken to task. You can read what I have said to him. I cant think of the name of the song, its sung by John Farnham (not that I'm a great fan of his) but the words of the song I like come to mind '..we're not going to sit in silence, we're not going to live in fear;' do you know it? Its actually got a catchy tune and I remember him telling the story of how they came to produce it. Anyway Bob, you are coming into your own. You have great people looking after you like Michael, and Harry and of course you know we are all out here wanting and supporting you. Here's to the New Year mate.

Bob, Thank you for writing this on Michael's Blog and Michael, thank you for posting it for us.
It is not often someone climbs into the pen to defend the case against the regular untruths and incorrect statements i.e. the regular rubblish being printed in the msm.
Congratulations on your courage to both of you, it is great to read this piece!!!!!!

Bob,
What a powerful comment. All power to you. Slow and steady wins the race, Bob.
Sending wishes that 2013 is your year.

Didn't they trundle out the aging satyr - so called after Hawke became Prime Minister, and was broadcast cavorting with barebreasted girls in Papua New Guinea (no disrespect to the girls involved, but it was not a good look for Hawkie) - in the buildup to the Queensland election? What a public relations coup that was.

Michael
It is said that history never repeats but it does rhyme.

In April 1653, Cromwell spoke to the Rump Parliament. His words ring fearfully true today.

"It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonoured by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money.

Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you? Is there one vice you do not possess? Ye have no more religion than my horse; gold is your God; which of you have not barter'd your conscience for bribes? Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth?

Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil'd this sacred place, and turn'd the Lord's temple into a den of thieves, by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress'd, are yourselves gone! So! Take away that shining bauble there (the mace), and lock up the doors. In the name of God, go!"

Well Bob. Having said what you have about the gillard and her shady past so eloquently and encouraged her to sue , we can only assume that she is guilty for it beggars belief that a Prime Minister would allow such statements too be made if she were innocent. She would have you in court in a heartbeat. We are all with you Bob and pray for justice and your own release from the suffering endured over this rotten matter. And I think something should also be done about the lies newspapers print. Surely something can be done to force a retraction at least due to the facts of an ongoing police investigation

I simply agree with all the sentiments.

Good onya Bob. That should put the wind firmly up her butt! She's a coward though so she won't do a thing except screech "I did nothing wrong". If she did sue you, there would be no standing room in the court because we would ALL turn up. Oh I think 2013 is going to be the best year yet. One way or another we will surely be rid of her with the election and then the New Prime Minister Tony Abbott can drag her screeching to face the music. Happy New Year Bob and family. Happy New Year Michael and family. Happy New Year to all the members here.

Ms Julia Gillard, the Prime Minister we're stuck with until the truth about her part in the AWU WRA fraudulent activities is allowed to be told, has a weakness for other married women's husbands, including Bruce Wilson, AWU, Michael O'Connor, CFMEU and brother of Brendan O'Connor MP, Dr Craig Emerson MP and Tim Mathieson, Hairdresser and Prime Minister's well paid current partner and soon to be beneficiary of a generous lifetime pension courtesy of the Labor Government for his public service. They're the ones she has publicly spoken about on ABC National Television and magazine stories. Goodness knows why any of them including Tim didn't see they were being used as she made her way to the top. Now it's Bob Hawke's turn in Queensland to dance to her tune to boost her electoral chances next year, you know solidarity forever. Hope Blanche and Tim were there as well to witness as she played her flirty games. Still they both know how the system works. Why Blanche even wrote Bob's autobiography, including how she won him over from Hazel, his loyal first wife and mother of his children. Even sold telemovie boasting of their affair. How degrading is that to the former First Lady of Australia who carried out her duties with such dignity and service to the community.

Anyway the Courier Mail is pretty lame not willing to post the author of their story. Hope someone sues them for heaps. Of course Bill Ludwig Snr will pay all their court costs. Wonder what Dr Emerson got as a reward for his part in the smear campaign?

Well done Bob Kernohan. Your response is totally honest and from the heart. Hope it can get a run in all newspapers, Sky News and maybe a YouTube video.

Stay safe Michael, Bob, Ralph and Harry. Wishing you a wonderful New Year.

I would like to see a few of the front bench liberals with the balls to make accusations against juliar hold a press conference,it would have much more of an impact
and she wouldn't be able to just ignore them.

Hi Bob,
I have just looked out of my window as the balloons in Melbourne fly over my apartment regularly. There is low cloud over the city this morning that may have held up the flights. I'll give a wave to Michael and Katerina.
Re Suing, Gillard has said it was not worth suing the nutjobs and misogynists as they haven't got any money. Now I would have thought removing the stain of the slander from one's name was worth more than gold. She could always hock the poils worth half a mill I believe, to pay her costs.
Perhaps as is said a woman has only 2 things to lose her virginity and her good name as she has long lost both, like Mae West, misses neither.

Inside criticism hits offending ban
Jared Owens
From: The Australian December 31, 2012 12:00AM

"A KEY anti-discrimination body has criticised Labor's proposed overhaul of discrimination law, predicting legal "confusion" unless a controversial clause outlawing offensive behaviour is rewritten or abandoned"

"The independent Anti-Discrimination Commission of Queensland has told a Senate inquiry that even its own staff would struggle to understand language contained in the draft legislation, which aims to consolidate five discrimination acts into one"

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/inside-criticism-hits-offending-ban/story-fn59niix-1226545450970

Mcben47, thank you also for the link. It is a great song. Happy New Year to you and to everybody here. It no doubt will be a tough year and we will probably get mad at a lot of things. Being able to express ourselves here and discuss things is a great help, knowing there are likeminded decent people out there.

Regarding defamation action, the Prime Minister may consider that her "targets" may have no money but the prime purpose of such action especially for her would be to get a retraction and an injunction against the perpetrators not to repeat the statements. Any failure to follow the injunction would result in contempt of court action and a gaol term as a consequence.

The PM is unwilling to do this because it will result in a public airing in court with witnesses required to give evidence under oath with all the consequences going with that. The fact that she has made no moves against any individual or organisation despite her protests that she has been defamed speaks volumes.

Enjoying a pint at Y & J's or perving on the lovely Chloe?

Bob, a hint: when you include in your allegations of stealing a reminder that Julia Gillard had an affair with a married man who had kids, it DETRACTS from your statement, it doesn't help. It is irrelevant to your allegation that Wilson was married and the number of kids is also irrelevant. It makes you look like you have some other agenda, a personal animus, and therefore many people don't take the rest very seriously.

My favorite American, Doctor Thomas Sowell recently observed that "if someone wrote a novel about a man who was raised from childhood to resent the successful and despise the basic values of America -- and who then went on to become President of the United States -- that novel would be considered too unbelievable, even for a work of fiction. Yet that is what has happened in real life."

If someone wrote a novel about a person who was raised from childhood to resent the successful and despise the basic values of Australia and who lied and cheated and stole and Denied and Projected -- and who then went on to lie and cheat and steal and bribe and Deny and to Project his way into the prime minister's office and to then besquat his house?

THAT novel would be considered WAY too unbelievable, even for a work of fiction.

Yet that is what has happened in real life.

The while ignored by the Left's Propaganda Ministry: AKA the "mainstream media."

Relevant Hansard extract for Bob Kernohan's grievance against Ms Gillard-------
Tuesday, 27 November 2012
Page: 13452
Prime Minister
Ms JULIE BISHOP (Curtin—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:17): My question is to the Prime Minister. I refer the Prime Minister to her previous answer and to this cheque drawn by Bruce Wilson in 1995 from the AWU Members Welfare Association for $15,000—

The SPEAKER: The Deputy Leader of the Opposition will desist.

Ms JULIE BISHOP: with handwritten instructions for payment of $10,000 to K Spyridis, a Melbourne builder. Can the Prime Minister guarantee that this payment was not for her home renovations?

Ms GILLARD (Lalor—Prime Minister) (14:17): I have dealt with these matters publicly.

Opposition members: No!

Ms GILLARD: Before the dirt team starts catcalling, let us be very clear here. I have dealt with these allegations publicly and I can guarantee that what the Deputy Leader of the Opposition refers to was not to my benefit and did not pay for renovations at my home. This is smear, pure and simple. What the Deputy Leader of the Opposition said in her question before—the allegation there about clothing—was smear, pure and simple.

Opposition members: Not clothing!

Ms GILLARD: Well, the allegation about whatever the—

Ms Julie Bishop interjecting—

The SPEAKER: Order! The Deputy Leader of the Opposition has asked her question.

Ms GILLARD: There is no amount of screaming that makes this falsehood true. I have answered this clearly and publicly on the public record now since 1995. I paid for the renovations at my home. This is smear, pure and simple.

Let us see how the opposition has put this smear, pure and simple, together. First, the Deputy Leader of the Opposition has spent time with a man who has said he believes he is guilty of fraud and is looking for immunity from that fraud as well as a series of other assertions about his conduct that he himself has made that would make you wonder why the Deputy Leader of the Opposition would spend time with such a person.

Then the Deputy Leader of the Opposition today has referred to an affidavit from Bob Kernohan. It is a matter of longstanding public record that this affidavit was drawn up by John Pasquarelli of One Nation. So there we have the Deputy Leader of the Opposition meeting with a man who, on his own admission, is guilty of fraud, and there is the Deputy Leader of the Opposition coming into this parliament and relying on the work of One Nation for smear, pure and simple...................