The Prime Minister's judgement with our motor car

Like many Australians, Julia Gillard gets a private plated, fully maintained motor car as a part of her salary package.

There are guidelines for its use, but its well within the guidelines for her partner Tim Mathieson to drive the car, as long as he's licenced, sober and authorised by Ms Gillard.   But Ms Gillard is our employee, she's the person on the payroll and she is personally accountable for the car we provide her.

The PM's office has plenty of government cars available for official government work.   Ms Gillard's private car is not one of them, it's hers and hers alone, and she is responsible for it to you and me, her employers.

On Sunday, News Limited newspapers carried the story about Ms Gillard's personal car being pinged for 8 traffic offences in what turns out be just over 3 months.   It was an interesting story - 8 times in just over 3 months is a pretty bad record and we were all curious to know who was driving.  The other ministers fessed up, so why not Ms Gillard?

So several media organisations asked Ms Gillard's office a simple question.   Who was driving?

No person in Australia is better able to answer that question than Ms Gillard.   It's her car.   She has to personally approve anyone driving it.  In the absence of a nominated driver it's Ms Gillard who is responsible for her car.

So how is this for a convoluted answer to a simple question.   Linda Silmalis of the Daily Telegraph was told:

While other MPs disclosed how the fines were incurred and by whom, Ms Gillard's office referred inquiries to Special Minister of State Gary Gray, whose office passed the matter to the Finance and Deregulation Department.

The department has requested an application under Freedom of Information laws before it will reveal the details.

What?   This is a personal matter for Ms Gillard's personal car.   Who was driving it Prime Minister?   It's on your salary package, you are accountable for it.   It's just not logical that  bureaucrats several departments away would know more about your domestic relationship at home with your family than you do.

How much government time, bureaucrat time, correspondence and drama was being created because Julia Gillard would not answer a simple question.   Who was driving your car when it was pinged?

So on Sunday night, I wrote a blog piece encouraging you, as taxpayers to write and ask Ms Gillard yourself.   She works for you, after all.

Here's a sample of one of our readers' notes.

From: 
Sent: Monday, 7 January 2013 7:39 AM
To: FOI
Subject: Prime Minister Julia Gillard's taxpayer-subsidised private car

Dear Sir / Madam

I am requesting information under the FOI Act in relation to traffic
infringements evidently incurred by the driver(s) of the Prime
Minister's private (government funded) car during 2012. 

Please provide me the names of the driver(s).....

 

The fines have been paid.   The work has been done.   The PM's office knows who was driving, and they know that you are entitled to know too.   It would take Ms Gillard all of 5 seconds with her PA to say - "let them know it was Tim, he was done 8 times on cameras", or whatever the truth is.

I'd do that.   Come clean.   Tell the truth early, get it out of the way.   But is that even close to what happened?

Can you believe we are even talking about this?   Here is the response, officially typed up, that our blog reader received from the Prime Minister's taxpayer funded legal team.

From: FOI [mailto:[email protected]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 2:14 PM
To: 
Cc: FOI
Subject: FOI/2013/007 - RE: Prime Minister Julia Gillard's
taxpayer-subsidised private car [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Dear Mx xxxxxx,

Please see the attached correspondence in relation to your FOI request.

Regards

Jasminder Higgins
FOI Adviser
Legal Policy Branch
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

And accompanying the email was this high-falutin' letter.

FOI-2013-007 - Transfer notification_redacted_001
Can you believe it?   How could another government department have a better insight into who drives the Gillard car down the shops than the Gillard family?

Just like the questions I sent Ms Gillard about the AWU-WRA in September, 2011, questions she refused to answer.   Just like the follow-up questions I've sent.   Or Andrew Bolt has sent.   Or Hedley Thomas has sent.   There's a pattern here of something a lot less than the truth being served up.

This business with the car is embarrassingly simple, she should have told the reporter on the weekend and it would all be over.   There would have been flack for a few days, then it's dealt with.   Instead, another cover up that will stay in place for a while and will allow "media management" of when and how the "rubbish is taken out" to quote my favourite spin-doctor.

Any tips for when?

Comments