Previous month:
January 2016
Next month:
March 2016

February 2016

On Angela, Julia, Hilary and Baz - the left's march on the media

Screen Shot 2016-02-03 at 5.54.23 pm

From Brietbart

Top German Journalist Admits Live On Air National News Agenda Set By Government

 
 

A retired media boss at a major German state broadcaster has admitted his network and others take orders from the government on what — and what not — to report.

National public service broadcaster Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (ZDF), which was recently forced into a humiliating apology for their silence on migrant violence and sex assault is being drawn into a fresh scandal after one of their former bureau chiefs admitted the company takes orders from the government on what it reports. He said journalists received instructions to write news that would be “to Ms. Merkel’s liking”.

Former head of ZDF Bonn Dr. Wolfgang Herles make the remarks during a radio event (from minute 27) in Berlin where journalists discussed the media landscape. Moving on to the freedom of the press, the panel chair asked Dr. Herles whether things in Germany had got “seriously out of whack”. With an honesty perhaps unusual in Germany, Dr. Herles replied that ordinary Germans were totally losing faith in the media, something he called a “scandal”. He said:

“We have the problem that – now I’m mainly talking about the public [state] media – we have a closeness to the government. Not only because commentary is mainly in line with the grand coalition (CSU, CDU, and SPD), with the spectrum of opinion, but also because we are completely taken in by the agenda laid down by the political class”.

Worse than the mainstream, government controlled and poll-tax funded media in Germany just agreeing with the ruling coalition, the stations actually took orders on what was and was not to be reported on. He said:

“…the topics about which are reported are laid down by the government.

“There are many topics that would be more important than what the government wants. But they, of course, want to deflect attention away from what doesn’t happen. Yet what doesn’t happen is often more important than what does happen – more important than gesture politics”.

While these orders are sent to media companies from unspecified places in the government, they are communicated to individual journalists by news executives using a new-speak jargon. Dr. Herles explains that while “there are, in fact, instructions from above”, when the editor in chief of ZDF communicated these instructions to his juniors he would merely say reporting should be framed in a way that “serves Europe and the public good”.

There would be no need to add in brackets that this actually means it should be reported “to Ms. Merkel’s liking”, as they would be understood as the true meaning.

“Today, one is not allowed to say anything negative about the refugees” said Dr. Herles, concluding: “This is government journalism and that leads to a situation in which people no longer trust us. This is a scandal.”

There has been very little reporting of the comments in the German media, and what there was has been critical of the remarks. Focus reported the comments of one centre-left media figure, Der Freitag newspaper editor Jakob Augstein who when asked whether there had ever been such “instructions from above”, said: “No, I deny vehemently there has ever been commands from the top”.

That the German mainstream media is not free and routinely obscures or bends the truth has been a key criticism by the Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of Europe (PEGIDA) movement, which has coined phrases like Lügenpresse — the liar press — to express their frustration.

 

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/am-call-that-put-pms-old-news-on-front-page/story-fn59niix-1226128513341


ADF's response to my queries about APR 2014 inquiry Morrison says he ordered into Paedophile Williams

Firstly a little background to my story below.

In 2006 Williams appealed the Chief of Air Force's determination that Williams was not a fit and proper person to work as an instructor/officer of cadets.   Defence had a legal team at the Federal Magistrates' Court hearing.   That gets noticed within Defence - and recorded on Defence computer systems.

Who allowed Williams to rejoin as an officer of Army cadets in 2012?  Who was disciplined?   What was the outcome of the inquiry Morrison is said to have commissioned?   Where's the report?

This should be dead easy for the ADF to point to.   Morrison took personal responsibility for the inquiry in 2014, good, let him or defence point to the report.

I've just received this reply to a chaser I sent earlier today.   I'm starting to wonder whether someone has something to hide.

Michael Smith 

3:48 PM (3 hours ago)
 
to Media
 
 
 
 
 
Hello, when do you think I might get a response?

 

Media

6:59 PM (18 minutes ago) 

   

to me

UNCLASSIFIED

Hi Michael,

Apologies for the delay in providing a response to you.

Defence is still working on your enquiry and we hope to provide you with a response as soon as possible.

Kind regards,

Defence Media | Department of Defence

____________________________________________

Russell Offices | PO Box 7909 | Canberra BC | ACT 2610

P: +61 2 6127 1999 | E: [email protected] | Follow us on Twitter: @DeptDefence

 

PS - Morrison calls himself a Veteran.   He joined the Army in 1979 and was commissioned into the RA Inf.   He must have worked very hard to avoid exposure to the ICB over those 36 years.   ICB, no, white ribbon apparently makes up for it.

Screen Shot 2016-02-03 at 4.52.05 pm

 

PS - For Maggie 47 and others

Infantry Combat Badge

Infantry Combat Badge

The Infantry Combat Badge (ICB) is awarded to a serving member of the Australian Army for service as an Infantryman in warlike operations.

Defence Instruction Army - Personnel [DI (A) Pers] 97-5 Infantry Combat Badge (ICB) details the policies and procedures applicable to the ICB which has been instituted for recognition of infantry service in warlike operations.

If this infantry officer Veteran had one it would be on his left breast above the ribbons he wears.

Here is a soldier wearing the ICB.

Screen Shot 2016-02-03 at 5.29.29 pm

http://www.army.gov.au/Army-life/Honours-and-Awards/Infantry-Combat-Badge/Frequently-Asked-Questions-Infantry-Combat-Badge


This disgraceful saga of child sexual abuse took place under the watch of General David Morrison.

This is the story of two men.   One of them is Christopher Gordon Williams - a fraudster, disbarred lawyer, thief, a gaoled child sexual offender and until recently an officer/instructor of army cadets, i.e. children.  The other is David Morrison, who led the Army while it ignored or failed to notice every possible warning about Williams and his crimes.

Here is a little of this atrocious record, commencing with Williams's time as an officer of the Australian Air Force Cadets prior to 2003.

11 November 1999 - Williams was convicted of 5 counts of serious fraud, Tasmania, sentenced to 3 months gaol (suspended)

February, 2003 - Williams surfaces in Sydney, commences work as Regional Staff Officer, St John Ambulance, New South Wales and is an officer/instructor with Australian Air Force Cadets.

May, 2003 - commences as Asst training officer at Volunteer Coast Guard, NSW.

10 June 2003 - Supreme Court, Tasmania makes orders to disbar Williams, removing his name from roll of legal practitioners, Tasmania, finding him not a fit and proper person.

9 October, 2003 - Director of the Australian Air Force Cadets writes to Williams formally terminating him as an instructor or officer of AAFC on the grounds he was "not a fit and proper person".   Williams had not disclosed fraud conviction to Air Force or defence.

.......Williams pursued lengthy internal appeals process against decision to terminate him.............

27 September, 2005 the delegate of the Chief of the Royal Australian Air Force affirmed the decision terminating Williams as an instructor/officer of Air Force Cadets.   Further allegations of mobile phone abuse and personal expenditure fraud against Williams were not dealt with as the decision to terminate him on the Tasmanian convictions made those proceedings apparently unnecessary. 

24 October, 2005 - Williams applied to the Federal Magistrates' Court for a review of the Chief of Air Force's decision to terminate him as an officer or instructor of Air Force Cadets.

11 May, 2006 - Federal Magistrate Murray McInnis handed down damning judgement against Williams, affirming the Chief of the Royal Australian Air Force's decision to terminate Williams on the grounds that he was not a fit and proper person to be an instructor or officer of cadets.

2008 - Williams appointed Grand Librarian of the United Supreme Grand Chapter of Mark And Royal Arch Masons, NSW and ACT.

June, 2011 - David Morrison appointed Chief of Army.

~April, 2012 - Christopher Gordon Williams appointed as an Officer of Cadets, Australian Army Cadets - posted to Rockdale Australian Army Cadets unit as 2LT/QM.   Used his real name, no attempt to obscure or change his identity.

2012-2013 - separate internal complaints made by female Army cadets, four 16-year-old-girls, who alleged Williams touched them inappropriately, or rubbed himself against them. Other officers raise concerns about his behaviour, including inappropriate use of mobile phone during parades, missing stores, theft and serious concerns about inappropriate dealings with girls.   An internal report covering the period raises:

a string of serious concerns including a “failure of AAC to handle complaints /allegations of inappropriate behaviour”; “inappropriate behaviour by AAC adult cadet staff” and “intimidation of staff and cadets by AAC command”.

“The length of this series of incidents is of serious concern,” a senior female cadet officer at the barracks said the inappropriate behaviour had been occurring since 2012.

“Parents and cadets have written letters of complaint against (the alleged perpetrator)relating to his behaviour,” the report notes the officer as saying.

“Further complaints have been made concerning the creation of a hostile environment by (him) through his continual leering at female cadets and photographing of female cadets.”

The report says the alleged perpetrator is “still at the unit and has a supervisory role over the children at the unit”, including “those who have made complaints concerning his inappropriate behaviour”.

The report says complaints were passed to the unit’s superior commander and then to NSW AAC head office. It claims “the only action taken” against the alleged perpetrator was “reading through the Working With Children procedures” with him.

13 June, 2013 - David Morrisson makes his youtube speech about respect for women.   Includes the famous line (which he now admits was stolen from General David Hurley), "The standard you walk past is the standard you accept".

June 2013 a 13 year old girl added Williams to her Facebook account as a " friend".   He was then a 60 year old team leader for Scouts Australia and was also a regional staff officer at St John Ambulance which the young person had an interest in.   Williams accepted the 13 year old girl's friend request.

Between late June and early August 2013 about 2,800 text and other messages were exchanged between Williams and the 13 year old girl.   Both parties were sending 20 to 30 messages in Facebook per day, which ranged from all hours until 2.20am.   "I'll have to come over and spank you, LOL", "Love you babe, dream of you I'm sure", "You are a Goddess, love yourself and always be nice to yourself, I will dream of you next to me, cuddling me and so happy to be family".
 
On Friday 26 July 2013 Williams texted the 13 YO girl, "If you want to do something to yourself, do something that will make you feel good - you can always masturbate, that will make you feel terrific and keep negative thoughts away".
 

August, 2013 - NSW Police receive tipoff about Williams prolific text messages to 13 year old Girl Scout.

2 September 2013 - NSW Police raid Williams house, find evidence of apparently serious offending. When asked by police if he had sent the text message suggesting the girl masturbate herself, Williams said, "Did I actually put that, no, I shouldn't have put that, I must have been tired.   Yeah, that is something I've written and I shouldn't have written.   Oh well, I answered a question (from the girl) probably without applying appropriate censorship I suppose.   It might have been something I thought but I didn't think I'd written it.   Obviously I didn't think about it and I shouldn't have sent it.   It was an unguarded moment".  The girl told police that Williams met with her twice at Westfield Shopping Centre Burwood since establishing the Facebook relationship.

6 September 2013 - Williams charged by NSW Police with using a carriage service to procure a child under 16 years for sexual activity - bailed to appear in court on 1 October 2013.  He continues to work with children at the Army Cadets.

Monday, 7 April 2014 - I received detailed tip off included detailed written reports confirming William's ongoing behaviour inside Army Cadet unit at Rockdale, NSW.   I attempted to make an urgent verbal report of the allegations to the ADF MediaOps centre on that Monday afternoon.    Call centre operator Eva (no surname was furnished) refused to accept a verbal report, I remonstrated somewhat and explained the urgency given a parade of cadets scheduled for the following morning but I was told no verbal report would be accepted.

Monday, 7 April, 2014 I phoned Minister David Johnston's office and spoke with Mark Dodd his media advisor.   DODD told me he would not take a verbal report, he told me to put something in writing and said, "I've got a Malaysian Airliner to find' before hanging up.

9 April, 2014 - I wrote to a senior NSW Supreme Court Judge associated with Australian Army Cadets outlining my concerns along with evidence supporting those concerns.   I did not receive a reply.

9 April 2014 - the first of my stories (with a byline shared by a staff writer) appeared in The Australian newspaper setting out Williams behaviour at the Rockdale Army Cadet Unit.  Later that day Williams was "stood aside" from the Rockdale cadet unit pending further investigations of the 2013 reported "unacceptable behaviour".

Screen Shot 2016-02-03 at 2.53.50 am

14 April, 2014 - NSW Police attend at the Rockdale Cadet Unit to interview 3 x 16 year old girls who had reported allegations of Williams inappropriate dealings with them dating back 2 years to his commencement with the unit in 2012.

15 April, 2014 - Williams appeared before Magistrate Mark Buncombe and entered a Guilty Plea to this charge "Christopher Gordon Williams, being 60 years of age, used a carriage service to transmit a communication to [BLANKED OUT] being someone who was under the age of 16 years, which was indecent, contrary to Section 474.27 A (1) of the Criminal Code".

17 April 2014 - I again wrote to Defence media asking among other things

WILLIAMS was on bail on child sex offences as of 7 September 2013.   How was he allowed to continue in close contact with female minors in the Australian Army Cadets until last week?   How did you not know the man was on bail for grooming a child for sex?   4 young girls have reported matters against him in the Army Cadets that I know of since 2012 - why was no action taken until last week?
 
I attach a LinkedIn profile for Christopher Gordon WILLIAMS.   As of this morning the first item in his professional resume is:

2LT(AAC) / QM

Australian Army Cadets
2012 – Present (2 years)
 
This LinkedIn profile could be used by WILLIAMS to procure another role involving minors.   What action has the Defence Force taken in relation to the LinkedIn posting?
 
I have previously referred you to this judgement of the Federal Magistrates' Court regarding WILLIAMS in which an Air Force administrative finding that he was not a fit and proper person to hold a position in the Australian Air Force Cadets was upheld by the court.   The Court record refers to WILLIAMS's dishonesty, his gaol sentence (suspended), his removal from the roll of solicitors upon his conviction and other matters of unsatisfactory conduct.
 
How was WILLIAMS able to join the Army Cadets without in any way hiding his personal details when these facts about him were so easily discovered?   
 
People who are close to concerned members of the ADF have contacted me suggesting that Defence is conducting a "witch-hunt" to find out who is "leaking" to the media.   Is there any internal Defence investigation underway?   If so why?   Has anyone within Defence been disciplined or counselled for passing on concerns about WILLIAMS and the fact that concerns first raised about his behaviour in 2012 have not been adequately responded to?

17 April, 2014 I received this response:

UNCLASSIFIED

Good afternoon Michael,

 

Thank you for your enquiry.

Following your previous enquiry regarding this matter on 8 April 2014, Defence can advise that;

  • the Chief of Army, Lieutenant General David Morrison, AO, has directed an inquiry into the allegations, including Australian Army Cadets (AAC) policies, procedures and management of complaints,
  • the individual concerned has been suspended from all duties and activities as an Officer of Cadets in the AAC,
  • Defence is assisting the NSW Police Force with their investigation,
  • members of the cadet unit have been offered referrals to support services.

At this time, Defence is therefore unable to release any further details regarding the individuals concerned, including their personal information, service history or the allegations, due to the investigation and the provisions of the Privacy Act.

Regards,

 

13 June, 2014 - Deputy Chief Magistrate Jane Culver sentenced Williams to 15 months gaol, with a minimum of 10 months.  

“Casting himself as a father-figure could only, on any view of the matter, increase the indecency of the comment … such a comment is so alien to any parental relationship between a father and 13-year-old girl,” Ms Culver said. 

“The innocence and confusion of the victim leaps out of these pages at every turn,’’ Ms Culver said. “It’s clear that the offender had a sexualised context in these communications, a sexualised expectation or a sexualised reference.”

Last Friday, 29 January 2016 I sent a chaser to Defence asking for a copy of the inquiry Morrison ordered into Williams and the allegations I first raised with defence in April 2014.

5 days ago I received this reply

UNCLASSIFIED

Hi Michael


Thanks for your email.  We will endeavour to respond as soon as possible but it won't be today.  A response early next week is most likely.

Also, could you please ensure all future correspondence goes to

Thanks,

XXXXX

Public Affairs Officer | Defence Media

Department of Defence | Russell Offices | PO Box 7909 Canberra BC ACT 2610

Follow us on Twitter: @DeptDefence

I'm currently still waiting on their reply.

 

Screen Shot 2016-02-03 at 12.00.51 am

Christopher Gordon WILLIAMS (DOB 20 March 1953) is recorded on CNI 784197947 - he is a sexual offender

And this man ran the organisation that ignored warning after warning and left him unsupervised with children. 

Screen Shot 2016-02-02 at 11.55.36 pm

David Morrison, Australian of the Year

 

PS, This meeting of July 2014 caught my eye.

Screen Shot 2016-02-03 at 2.32.08 am

It noted:

Screen Shot 2016-02-03 at 2.32.39 am

And resolved:

Screen Shot 2016-02-03 at 2.33.48 am

I don't know what role if any the Lodge played in this saga.   But I note this very detailed social media post from someone who apparently does.

The person who taught me the handshake said "Do this and you'll be looked after"

The best example I can provide right now of the power of the "secret handshake" would be the case of Christopher Gordon Williams.

Williams was a disbarred as a lawyer and sentenced to three months jail for fraud.

Williams had previously been arrested and charged with offences involving a 13 year old girl in Scouts Australia.

Williams had previously been an Air Force Cadet officer, working with children. The Chief of the RAAF had declared him of unsatisfactory character and discharged him from the Air Force Cadets.

DESPITE all of the above he then managed to get into the Australian Army Cadets as an officer.

He was then the subject of 4 separate complaints by young girls against him in the army cadets.

He then started texting another female cadet.

In 2013 he was charged with using social media to groom a 13-year-old girl for sex. He was also charged with using a carriage service to procure a person under 16 for sex and using a carriage service to send indecent materials to someone under 16

Williams is now in jail. How did he get into the Army Cadets when he was clearly so unsuited and a danger to children?

Answer: He was a Freemason, and was the Grand Librarian at the Sydney Masonic Centre.

In my time in the army I repeatedly raised warnings about the behaviour of the Officers of Cadets. Every time I was ordered to shut up.

The power of a handshake.

 

I will keep you posted, but MORRISON should be ashamed of himself.


Islamic Fatwah ADF linked to explains why Muslims must obey and accept Islamic State leadership as legitimate

Screen Shot 2016-02-02 at 3.26.07 pm

Islam commands its followers:

When a man becomes caliph by prevailing over the people by the sword, and he establishes his authority and takes full control, then it becomes obligatory to obey him and he becomes the leader of the Muslims.

Islam Question and Answer

General Supervisor: Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid
Tue 23 Rb2 1437 - 2 February 2016 

111836: How the caliph of the Muslims is appointed


How did the Islamic state organize its affairs? How did the government rule in the earliest period?.

Published Date: 2008-03-08
Praise be to Allaah.

The Muslim ruler must appoint people who are qualified to hold positions of high office in the state, and he must also hold consultations with people of knowledge and those who are specialized in various fields. That should not be left to the common folk or the masses for everyone to elect his relative or a member of his party, or to elect the one who will pay the most. 

Shaykh Saalih ibn Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said: 

Official positions that are lower than that of caliph or ruler: Appointing people to these positions was the job of the caliph or ruler. He had the authority to select for them people who were competent and had integrity. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Verily, Allaah commands that you should render back the trusts to those, to whom they are due; and that when you judge between men, you judge with justice” [al-Nisa’ 4:58]. This is addressed to rulers and those in authority. Trusts (amaanaat) here refers to official positions and positions of high office in the state, which Allaah made a trust that is entrusted to the ruler. The way in which it is to be fulfilled is by choosing people who are competent and have integrity, as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and the caliphs who came after him and the Muslim rulers after them appointed to various positions those who were fit to hold those positions and were able to fulfil these duties as prescribed in sharee’ah. 

With regard to elections as they are known today in different states, they are not part of the Islamic system and they may lead to disorder and chaos and personal ambitions. They are subject to favouritism and greed, and may lead to fitnah (tribulation) and bloodshed. They do not achieve the purpose they are meant to achieve; rather they are more like auctions, buying and selling, and false propaganda. End quote. 

 

The imam (ruler) or caliph was appointed to lead the Islamic state by one of three methods: 

1-

He was chosen and elected by the decision makers (ahl al-hall wa’l-‘aqd). For example, Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq became caliph when he was elected by the decision makers, then the Sahaabah unanimously agreed with that and swore allegiance to him, and accepted him as caliph. 

‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaan (may Allaah be pleased with him) became caliph in a similar manner, when ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab (may Allaah be pleased with him) delegated the appointment of the caliph to come after him to a shoora council of six of the senior Sahaabah, who were to elect one of their number. ‘Abd al-Rahmaan ibn ‘Awf consulted the Muhaajireen and Ansaar, and when he saw that the people were all inclined towards ‘Uthmaan, he swore allegiance to him first, then the rest of the six swore allegiance to him, followed by the Muhaajireen and Ansaar, so he was elected as caliph by the decision makers. 

‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib (may Allaah be pleased with him) became caliph in a similar manner, when he was elected by most of the decision makers. 

2-

Appointment to the position by the previous caliph, when one caliph passes on the position to a particular person who is to succeed him after he dies. For example, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab became caliph when the position was passed on to him by Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq (may Allaah be pleased with him). 

3-

By means of force and prevailing over others. Examples of that include some of the Umayyad and ‘Abbasid caliphs, and those who came after them. This method is contrary to sharee’ah, because it is seized by force. But because great interests are served by having a ruler who rules the ummah, and because a great deal of mischief may result from chaos and loss of security in the land, the one who seizes authority by means of the sword should be obeyed if he seizes power by force but he rules in accordance with the laws of Allaah. 

Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: 

If a man rebels and seizes power, the people must obey him, even if he seizes power by force and without their consent, because he has seized power. 

The reason for that is that if his rule is contested, it will lead to a great deal of evil, and this is what happened during the Umayyad period when some of them seized power by means of force and gained the title of caliph, and people obeyed them in obedience to the command of Allaah. End quote. 

Sharh al-‘Aqeedah al-Safaareeniyyah (p. 688). 

For more information on this topic, and to find out how the state should operate and how its affairs should be run, please see Ahkaam al-Sultaaniyyah by Abu’l-Hasan al-Maawardi al-Shaafa’i and Ahkaam al-Sultaaniyyah by Abu Ya’la al-Farra’ al-Hanbali, and al-Tarteeb al-Idaariyyah by al-Kattaani. 

And Allaah knows best.


FOI request to Defence for the documents authorising celebrity Muslim Mona Shindy to operate @navyislamic Twitter acc

Apparently the Chief of the Royal Australian Navy and celebrity Muslim Mona made their decisions about setting up the @NavyIslamic Twitter service based on "the vibe".  Or perhaps Mona just went ahead and did it without approvals.  Either way, in answer to our reader's request for the documents that might explain all, Defence has "refused access to these documents because they don't exist".  Got that?  Good.  Now move over to the mess with your pans, set, messing so we can consider your request for lunch that hasn't been cooked.

Thank you to our reader GL for this insight into how things get done in this man's Navy.

I wanted to know who approved for Captain Mona Shindy RAN, CSC to use Defence multimedia infrastructure to convey her twitter account and similar material. Reading Clause 11 of the response letter, it would appear that no manager in Defence had authorised her actions. Her chain of command are legally in the clear, but demonstrate poor judgement and lack of governance and oversight.

In my opinion she is in breach of the Defence Act, and I will be further researching this aspect.

In the mean-time, I have another FOI request that is being processed on who has authorised the said lady to wear a headscarf when in formal Navy uniform. To the best of my knowledge headscarfs are not part of the Navy uniform code. I await that answer with baited breath.

Kind Regards

Screen Shot 2016-02-02 at 12.24.24 pm Screen Shot 2016-02-02 at 12.24.34 pm Screen Shot 2016-02-02 at 12.24.41 pm Screen Shot 2016-02-02 at 12.24.50 pm