Previous month:
July 2016
Next month:
September 2016

August 2016

Ralph Blewitt on the 5 year anniversary of HSU/AWU stories and today's charges against Kathy Jackson

5 years ago this week Julia Gillard threatened News Limited and two of its executives with very serious damage unless the company and the two executives immediately met 3 demands - withdraw a story about Gillard and the AWU published by The Australian, issue a broad apology and enter into an agreement never again to report on The AWU Scandal.

Gillard's extortion was wholly successful that Monday morning and her continuing demand was complied with for at least one year.

About one year later Ralph Blewitt spoke publicly about his role in a conspiracy with Gillard and Bruce Wilson to cheat and defraud.

Yesterday Ralph and I spent the day together and have recorded lengthy interviews today.

While we've been talking word came through that the fraudster and whistleblower Kathy Jackson has today been charged by police over her own thefts of HSU money which she used to fund a lavish lifestyle.

Ralph and I spoke about Jackson and the Labor Party in this first part of our series of discussions.


The union representing stage actors endorses Hillary Clinton for role of President

The earnest statement from the Over-Actors Equity union is hilarious.  If you've not been following the US Presidential election campaign Over-Actors Equity has a handy tear out and keep "This Election is About" section.

Over Actors Equity says the election is about:

  • should people carry guns in theatres
  • should young gay people be tortured
  • should America admit defeat, apologise to taxpayers and stop funding the Department of Education

I have to admit to waiting for the punchline in reading this statement.   But there's no hint of irony, no facetious lines,  this is the real deal.

The Actors Trade Union is endorsing one the world's most polished pretenders to play the role of leader of the free world.


Screen Shot 2016-08-31 at 5.54.15 am

Part Two of PNG, Bill and Hillary, missing $$$millions and the hospital that never was

Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 1.27.17 pm


In 2012 the Harvard Political Review published this opinion piece about Papua New Guinea

Papua New Guinea is an attractive destination for investors due to its untapped 22.6 trillion cubic feet in natural gas, not to mention its copper and gold wealth.  Exxon Mobil is working on a $15.7 billion liquefied natural gas project that should due to be completed in 2014.  The China Metallurgical Group Corporation (MCC) is developing China’s largest overseas mining investment, a $1.6 billion attempt to exploit 140 million tons of nickel.

As is typical of situations in which foreign investment is involved, outside nations require government compliance in forging ahead with their designs.  China had an easy time injecting itself in the nation when Somare was in charge. 

Last spring, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton admonished Somare for getting too close to his neighbor to the north. She warned of a “resource curse,” insinuating that he would fail as leader if he lacked commitment to good governance, transparency, and accountability.  ...

(After the trip Clinton said to congressional colleagues)“Let’s put aside the moral, humanitarian, do-good side of what we believe in and let’s just talk straight, realpolitik.”

She bluntly claimed that China is trying to “come in under us” regarding “Papua New Guinea’s huge energy find.” As if there was any doubt, she strongly asserted, “We are in a competition with China.”


According to reports like the Harvard piece above, Clinton did not appear well disposed towards Somare.  The public "admonishment" over China and insinuations about Somare's probity seemed quite a personal and inappropriate public attack for the US Secretary of State to make as a guest on an official visit in Prime Minister Somare's country.  Particularly while visiting ostensibly to improve relations between their nations.

Beyond admonishing Somare over getting close to China and advising colleagues of China "coming in under us" in PNG, it's hard to find anything Clinton actually did to address the problem of China's economic march into New Guinea.  

The US Department of State has long maintained a comprehensive list of "Investment Climate Statements", the core trade related document for each nation US concerns invest or trade in. The 2010 lis is here

Having put PNG forward at the start of 2010 as a priority visit, then with the luxury of 11 months to prepare after cancelling in January, it's surprising that Clinton didn't ask for an "Investment Climate Statement" for PNG. The US didn't have one.  In 2010 the US produced the research for nations like Burkina FasoZimbabweFiji - even West Bank and Gaza.  But US investors couldn't turn to the US State Department for advice about investing in PNG.

It wasn't until late 2012 as Clinton's term was finishing that the first synopsis of trade with PNG was produced - 2012 Investment Climate Statement - Papua New Guinea

It's a thorough, professional document - but it focusses strongly on reasons for US companies not to do business with PNG - crime, corruption, weak contract laws etc.

In Port Moresby in 2010 Clinton was angry enough about China's investments in PNG to admonish PNG's PM.  The first US investment climate report for PNG was produced at the tail end of her watch as SEC State:

Bilateral Investment Agreements

Papua New Guinea has bilateral investment treaties with Australia, China, Germany, Malaysia, and the United Kingdom, and is in the process of finalizing one with Japan. Papua New Guinea does not have a bilateral investment treaty or a bilateral taxation treaty with the U.S.

The most recent report produced in 2015 shows that 5 years after Clinton fired up there was still no action on a formal investment relationship.

14. Bilateral Investment Agreements

Papua New Guinea does not have a bilateral investment treaty with the United States.

Papua New Guinea has bilateral investment treaties with Australia, China, Germany, Japan, Malaysia, and the United Kingdom. Papua New Guinea also has bilateral taxation treaties with a number of countries, including ones just completed in 2014 with Japan and New Zealand.

Bilateral Taxation Treaties

Papua New Guinea does not have a bilateral taxation treaty with the United States.



Clinton's angry response about trade was frankly disproportionate to the rounding error damage China was inflicting on broader US interests through its growth in PNG.

Ever since 2010 China's been steadily working up to this with PNG:

Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 8.17.03 am

The two countries agreed to seize opportunities to synergize development strategies as China follows through on the 13th Five-Year Plan and the Belt and Road Initiative and Papua New Guinea implements the Development Strategic Plan 2010-2030, with a view to achieving win-win mutual development outcomes.

....agreed to strengthen cooperation in such areas as trade, investment, downstream processing/manufacturing, agriculture, forestry, fishery, energy, resources, civil aviation, tourism, construction and infrastructure, transportation and communications, launch a joint feasibility study on a bilateral free trade agreement at an early date, and strengthen cooperation in mineral exploration and development between the Ministry of Land and Resources of China and the Ministry of Mining of Papua New Guinea. China will continue to provide Papua New Guinea with economic and technical assistance to grow the economy and improve people's welfare.

The two countries agreed to expand exchanges and cooperation in education, culture, youth, health and other fields to enhance mutual understanding and friendship between two peoples.

China and PNG agreed to enhance bilateral cooperation and coordination in multilateral mechanisms, including at the United Nations, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), and the Pacific Islands Forum so as to jointly safeguard the interest of all the developing countries. Both countries support reform of the UN Security Council and maintain that such reform should enhance the authority and effectiveness of the Council and increase the representation of the developing countries, that a packet solution should be sought through full and democratic consultation and consensus-building and that a reform solution that is deeply divided shall not be forced ahead. China will provide support and help to Papua New Guinea for its hosting of the 2018 APEC Economic Leaders' Meeting.

During the visit, both countries signed documents (listed in the attached annex), including Civil Aviation Agreement between the Government of the P. R.China and the Government of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea and Framework Agreement between the Government of the P. R.China and the Government of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea for Developing Cooperation on Production Capacity.

Documents Signed between China and PNG during Hon. Prime Minister Peter O'Neill's Official Visit to China

1. Framework Agreement between the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea for Developing Cooperation on Production Capacity

2. Civil Aviation Agreement between the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea

3. Memorandum of Understanding regarding the Joint Feasibility Study on a China and Papua New Guinea Free Trade Agreement between Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China and Department of Trade, Commerce and Industry of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea

4. Framework Agreement On the Provision of Concessional Loan between the Government of China and the Government of PNG on Lae Tidal Basin West Side Industrial Development Project

5. Framework Agreement On the Provision of Concessional Loan between the Government of China and the Government of PNG on Reconstruction and Upgrade of 4 Lane Highway for Keltiga Junction to Kagamuga Airport of Highland Highway Project

6. Preferential Buyer Credit Loan Agreement on PNG National Submarine Fiber Cable Network Project

7. Government Concessional Loan Agreement On Lae Tidal Basin Industrial Development Project


Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 8.13.45 am







But trade and economic growth never appeared large on Clinton's official agenda as US Secretary of State.  Compare China's easy to see strategy and tactics with the US
 under Clinton.

While China went to PNG to do business, Clinton's official representations in the name of US relations focussed on her hackneyed repertoire of  left-wing social issues. 

Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 8.59.30 am

At the start of 2010 Clinton prioritised a visit to PNG.  11 months later when she went, the US didn't even have a research paper on investing in PNG.

Promoting US investment was never a priority for Clinton in her official role.  Clinton's official focus as US Secretary of State is accurately recorded here in the official US State Department record of her trip.  

Secretary Clinton's Visit to Papua New Guinea Underscores U.S. Engagement with Pacific Island Countries


Fact Sheet
Office of the Spokesman
Washington, DC
November 3, 2010

Secretary Clinton’s visit to Papua New Guinea underscores the value the United States attaches to longstanding and close relationships with the countries and peoples of Papua New Guinea (PNG) and other Pacific Islands nations, where we have significant and growing interests. Our relations with the region are an integral part of our broader engagement with the Asia-Pacific. We have shared interests in freedom of navigation, cooperation on climate change, food security, and biodiversity protection. Pacific nations play an important leadership role on these and other global issues, particularly in the United Nations and in supporting international peacekeeping missions.

  • Reinvigorating high-level engagement with Pacific Island countries. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton held her second annual meeting with Pacific Island leaders on the margins of the United Nations General Assembly in New York in September 2010. The United States also sent the largest, multi-agency delegation ever, including key personnel from the Pentagon and Pacific Command, to the recent Pacific Islands Forum meeting in Vanuatu.
  • Increasing climate change assistance. The United States understands the importance of climate change for Pacific Island countries and has pledged more than $21.5 million over the next two years, pending Congressional approval, in climate change assistance for Pacific Island countries.
  • Protecting the environment. Secretary Clinton’s visit to the Tubuserea Lavadai Mangrove Reforestation project, funded in part by a U.S. grant, demonstrates U.S. support for biodiversity, natural resource management and climate change adaptation. The Unites States also provides support for the Coral Triangle Initiative, which protects marine biodiversity, improve capacity for coastal and fishery management, and supports adaptation to climate change in the Pacific.
  • Empowering women. The United States is committed to help empower women in Papua New Guinea and the region. Secretary Clinton announced that the United States will partner with the World Bank Group and the government of Papua New Guinea to host a regional dialogue next year in Port Moresby to discuss how best to empower women, including maternal health and economic empowerment.
  • Promoting good governance. Papua New Guinea is richly endowed with natural resources, including gold, copper, oil, natural gas, and other minerals. Development of these resources would be a boon for the PNG economy while helping to meet global and regional demand. Properly managed, the increased revenue derived from natural resource exports could fund improvements in social services and infrastructure, enhancing greatly the country’s regional profile. Responsible environmental stewardship of resource wealth is also essential to protect PNG’s biodiversity. The United States is providing Papua New Guinea a wide range of technical assistance to build institutional capacity to manage its resource wealth effectively and responsibly, while minimizing corruption, waste, mismanagement, and environmental degradation.

She gave one major speech during her brief visit:

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you, Ambassador, thank you. (Applause.) Good evening, everyone. It is a great pleasure for me to be here with all of you. I am delighted that I am finally here. (Applause.) We had originally planned to do this last January. But, as you know, I was on my way here when the terrible earthquake in Haiti occurred, and I had to turn around. But I said at that time I would come to Papua New Guinea. And I am so pleased to see you all here tonight. (Applause.)

I want to thank Ambassador Bogari for her remarks, and for guiding me to see these wonderful displays. And, of course, I want to also, in her absence, thank Dame Kidu for the work that she did in helping to prepare this. It’s unfortunate she cannot be here this evening. But I hope each and every one of you will express to her when you see her my deep gratitude for her leadership. She has been an outspoken advocate for women’s rights and political participation. (Applause.) But she is the only woman member of parliament. And one of the very first displays that I saw said it all, I think. “One Woman is Not Enough.” (Applause.) And so, I hope that there will be more women in parliament in the years ahead.

I want to thank each and every one of you who were standing by the displays which, as the ambassador said, very well describe the depth and the breadth of women’s involvement in leadership in your country. The women who I briefly met – and it was much too brief – but I could tell from the descriptions that the women I was meeting are women who are making a difference here in Papua New Guinea.

And I want to thank you all, judges and magistrates, medical professionals, HIV/AIDS activists, farmers, artists, police officers and army officers, the women who are working to advance the rights of people with disabilities, the women who are working with (inaudible), the women who are making such a difference. And I know how you each, in your own way, have helped to pave the way for girls and women to go even farther in the future. And you are helping women be able to make the most of their own lives, and live up to their own God-given potential. So I would like to take a moment for all of us to recognize you, and to thank you for everything you do. (Applause.)

But what you are doing is essential, because no country in the 21st century can advance if half the population is left behind. The talents of everyone must be used, because the challenges we face require all of us. From climate change to child mortality, everything we face is too complex not to get the most out of every single person. And when we invest in women, we’re not just investing in individuals. We are investing in families, and we are investing in the next generation, and we are investing in communities and countries. (Applause.)

Giving women access to education, health services, economic opportunities, and the structures of power is critical to alleviating poverty and disease in every part of the world. The United States is committed to working with you. That is why, next year, the United States, along with the Government of Papua New Guinea and the World Bank Group will bring together senior government officials and business leaders from across the Pacific to discuss how, together, we can expand vital opportunities for women. (Applause.)

Now, that is going to be an important occasion, and I know many of you will be participating. And we want to do more than that. We want to give Dame (inaudible) in the parliament. So the State Department is working with local organizations to help prepare women voters for the upcoming national elections in 2012. And let’s get some more women to run for office in 2012. (Applause.)

Now, we are not only going to be training candidates for office, but we are going to be working very hard to combat violence against women and girls. If a woman or a girl cannot be safe in her own home, or safe in her own family, or safe in her own community, then that woman or girl will not have the chance to make the most out of her life. So we will be working with Exxon Mobil and local organizations on a mentoring program aimed at ending the culture of violence against women and girls in Papua New Guinea. (Applause.)

We will also be stepping up the fight against HIV by doubling our contribution to fight HIV/AIDS here next year. (Applause.) Papua New Guinea’s HIV rates are some of the highest in Asia. And women are particularly vulnerable. And, as I was looking at the displays, I saw the display and saw the mention of the Clinton Foundation. And my husband is very proud of the work that his foundation is doing here. And we want to really make it a public campaign to try to prevent HIV/AIDS, and to treat and help those who have the disease. We are also ready to work with your government to pass and enforce tough laws against the trafficking of human beings, particularly young girls and young women. (Applause.)

Now, everything I have heard from our ambassador and from others who are much more familiar with your country than I am have told me about how strong and courageous the women of this country are. And, of course, we have a woman of valor, a courage award-winner here, as well, this evening. And I want to assure you that, as Secretary of State for the United States, empowering women, enabling more women to have access to their rights, to take their position in society, to choose what is best for themselves and their families, is one of my highest priorities. And I will do everything I can to assist you. (Applause.)

And I look forward to working with you. And I think it’s next year that one of my top officials, the global ambassador for women, Ambassador Melanne Verveer, will come to Papua New Guinea to follow up on my visit to work with the women here to figure out what else the United States can do, so that we have even more women playing leadership roles in every aspect of your society.

Thank you all very, very much. (Applause.)

After a private meeting Clinton and Somare held a brief press conference.  Somare kicked off, clearly having some trouble in pretending to support Clinton's aims:

Papua New Guinea will continue to be a constructive partner in international efforts to combat terrorism, drug trafficking and production and address climate change, which is one of our very important agendas in our development, and gender balance and sustainable development and (inaudible) development and climate change, and we want to be able to sustain the developments that are going on.

In the area of climate change, Madam, I am thankful that the United States Government made a commitment of 21 million dollars to assist the (inaudible) for mitigation purposes. And we are also glad that, with our (inaudible) program, we will be also looking forward to a (inaudible) meeting to reach some understanding on the efforts that we are taking on climate change.

We have always enjoyed a friendly and mutual relationship. When the President (Clinton) was here I had a visit. We would have hoped that you would have spent a day visiting one of our towns outside to really get a feeling of Papua New Guinea, that this is just a – cosmopolitan feeling, but if you had gone out -- outside Port Moresby, you will find that you are really (inaudible) the villages and see the lifestyle of our people, how we live.

We want to thank you once again for honoring us, and you made a commitment that you will return before the year falls, and you have done it. (Laughter.) Thank you so much.

After some opening remarks from Clinton the press asked 4 questions, one of them about Clinton's war on violence against women.  Somare's answer can't have impressed her - but then the barbs were two-way between two people who did not seem happy to be with each other.

PRIME MINISTER SOMARE: To answer your question on the violence against women, yes, we have cases where there are these type of happenings, but we know that we have systems through the welfare system who can be controlled and the women also have a right to be able to use our courts and legal system (inaudible) courts if they are treated this way.

But I think overall, we sometimes get a painted picture of how cruel we are with our women, and this is not true. This is a perception from people like yourself and people who write about us. That’s what they like to paint about this country. And I’m telling you that I have been around for a long time and I know that men and the women, sometimes there are fights, arguments do take place, but it’s nothing very brutal about violence against women. There are cases. These are criminal cases. If you are talking about criminal cases, they’re different, but normal way of life, normal way of living; i.e., I can stand up here and vow to you that Papua New Guinea has systems.

I think with more education now, more and more of our people are educated, young men and women are educated, and they understand that violence against women is wrong. And even our civil service and people who are employed in industries, they know it’s against the law to use violence against women. We have cases where people are drunk, which you know might (inaudible) a person who cannot control when he’s under the influence of liquor. And you find that sometimes (inaudible) it takes place in some places. We cannot deny it.

But we are doing everything possible, and through the education system alone and allowing the women to play a very important role in a society. That’s the only way we can overcome this problem. But all in all, sometimes it’s exaggerated by people who write about us. Thank you.


So where did Clinton's impassioned reaction to Chinese investment come from?  What drove it? If she was genuine in her belief that China was damaging US interests by its investment program in PNG, one would expect to see some sort of US response to advance US investments in PNG on the trade front.

Her actions don't show much support for the idea she was driven by Chinese damage to US economic interests in PNG.


Was she reacting to having been kicked hard where it hurt the most, right in her ample Clinton Foundation?

No one spoke about the elephant in the Clinton/Somare room during Clinton's whistlestop visit.

The Pacific Medical Centre had been big news in Port Moresby for months.

The project was hugely controversial and the local medical profession had run a highly organised and very public campaign against Somare's government over the issue.

Since April there'd been solid and consistent reporting of Somare's visit to New York where he'd secured support for the project from the prestigious William J Clinton Foundation.  It was public knowledge that Bill Clinton was going to announce the project in New York that October.

The silence on the issue when Hillary was there would have been deafening.

Neither Clinton nor Somare said a thing, but the tension was palpable.

Somare later tried to distance himself from the project after the Clinton announcement failed to materialise.   Somare painted his Health Minister as a lone wolf on an ill-fated frolic. 

This is the story of the ill-fated frolic those grown men, including Bill Clinton, had been up to.


April 2010 and the project was greenlighted by Bill Clinton and the Foundation

Prime Minister Somare, PNG's Ambassador and another Minister met with Bill Clinton in April 2010 to discuss PNG's LNG contract revenues and the Pacific Medical Centre project.

All of the PNG attendees at that meeting sent various letters, emails and other documents recording what Clinton said at their meeting.  Much of that found its way into the local press - like this published account made by PNG's health minister:

Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 9.27.10 am

Clinton had people in PNG and at no stage did he correct or deny the reports about his support for and involvement in the project.

The PNG government proceeded in the belief the Clinton Foundation support was locked in.

Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 10.57.13 amAfter allocating $20M to the project in November 2009 (money for some sort of facilitation or establishment fee - the destination for that money is the subject of ongoing investigations) the PNG Government made no further budgetary allocation in the 2010 budget.

By April things were firming up.  The PNG Ambassador to the US report the April meeting and its follow up with Clinton and his staff:

President Clinton indicated he would be making a major announcement of his support – and the Clinton Foundation’s support – for the PMC project in late September 2010 in New York City during the annual meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative.

President Clinton’s support for the Pacific Medical Center project would also see him reach out to other western governments and corporate leaders to support the PMC as a major healthcare initiative for our entire nation and other Pacific Islands nations; this would include President Clinton’s outreach – on PNG’s behalf – to the leaders of other nations that provide PNG bilateral development assistance, founders/CEOs of major foundations in the U.S. and  CEOs of major corporations that have various business interests in PNG and other major prospective partners to get them involved in supporting the PMC project would as well.

While the high profile public announcement from Clinton had been locked in, funding had not.   Somare instructed Departments to work together to prepare budgets that made provision for building the hospital in the 2011 year.   The health ministry was tasked with making sure the project was financed.  Somehow.

There must have been a flurry of activity in June in PNG health!

The Minister, Sasa Zibe was apparently headed off on 24 June.

On 23 June 2010 a paper setting out the Health Department's capital funding requirements and the source of funds was ready for submission by the Minister to the Cabinet meetings leading to approvals for the PNG Government 2011 budget.  

The proposal was for funding by means of a Chinese Government loan for construction of 4 new regional hospitals.  Other ministries beyond health had roles to play.  The loan would also cover replacement and upgrades of dilapidated hospital system plant and equipment.  

Bora, Popendetta, Nonga and Jiwaka hospitals were all cactus - if it wasn't the ocean inundation it was volcanic eruptions.   The arguments for the urgent and unavoidable spending of about 800M Kina were impeccably presented.  There wasn't a spare Kina left and everything in the submission absolutely positively unavoidably just had to get funded and done! 

There it was, perfectly written, funding by a loan from China of 800M Kina for 4 new hospitals and upgrades to plant and equipment in hospitals that were way, way overdue.  No brainer. Just needed the Minister's signature.





Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 9.51.00 am


Minister Zibe or someone on his behalf wrote "Mark, please see changes inside to the submission, amend the corrections accordingly ASAP before I depart tomorrow for...."

I can imagine the reaction as the person responsible for this perfect submission saw the first hint of changes needed.



Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 9.51.17 am

Oh, that's interesting, we're adding one Pacific Medical Centre and subtracting housing for workers at provincial centres.  Right.  Wonder how they'll justify that.

There's the justification, "Pacific Medical Centre is an initiative of the national government to provide a specialised tertiary treatment and full service training facility".   Right.  Well that's that then.





Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 9.51.24 am

And there in glorious handwritten scribble is the detailed budgetary submission for the financing of PNG's Pacific Medical Centre unequivocally supported by President William J Clinton after his customary due diligence.

Add 230,400,000 Kina for one Pacific Medical Centre

Take away all the medical equipment replacement for all provincial hospitals for 2011 to 2013

Take away all static plant replacement program for all provincial hospitals for 2011 to 2012

Shit, still way over budget.  Right.

Take away all housing for all provincial workers and can the Health Nationwide Institutional Housing Program.  No one will notice.

Total - 800 million Kina.  Hot diggety.





Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 9.51.33 am Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 9.51.40 am

So the money for the Pacific Medical Centre had been found.  It was coming from Covec Ltd, a Chinese State Owned Corporation based in PNG.

The US had no official reaction to China funding New Guinea's borrowings for hospitals.  The US was by then itself a substantial debtor to China with its own huge fiscal deficits to fund.  When the official US climate investment report for PNG was produced its first few lines noted:

Openness to, and Restrictions Upon, Foreign Investment

The Government of Papua New Guinea (Papua New Guinea) welcomes foreign investment and the country has a liberal investment regime. The government has made considerable progress by creating policies and systems to streamline the regulatory and administrative requirements for foreign investors. This has included the establishment of the Investment Promotion Authority (IPA) which is mandated by an Act of Parliament to promote and facilitate investment and act as a one-stop-shop facility for investors.

A US Secretary of State would find it hard to justify criticism of either the PM of PNG for the policy or China for responding to it.

Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 11.36.49 am

In the context of continuing revelations about the overtly corrupt practices of the Clinton Foundation and its early central involvement in the PMC hospital development, I think it's useful to look at the Clinton Foundation and its interests as the possible source of Hillary's antipathy towards Somare.

In June 2010 The Australian newspaper carried this heartbreaking story by Rowan Callick.   Still the Clinton Foundation pressed on with its preparations for the PMC and broader engagement with Somare and his gangs of thieves.


Grand larceny robs PNG of millions

June 12, 20102 comments

Rowan Callick / The Australian

Good governance has fallen hostage to elements of the elite who siphon off vast sums of public money

PAPUA New Guinea’s assistant Auditor-General Gordon Kega has discovered $2 million was paid to 87 people “for unknown services” out of relief funds given to Oro province following cyclone Guba in November 2007.

His investigation urges criminal charges against those who “fraudulently and illegally paid themselves”, often simply by shifting money from the relief funds into their personal bank accounts.

A further $800,000 was paid to businesses and other organisations for goods and services that were unverifiable.Those involved included “disaster officials, senior government officers, bank officers”.

A few days ago, Oro’s provincial administrator Owen Awaita urged AusAID to build a permanent bridge in the province after its predecessor was washed away by cyclone Guba, since temporary alternatives have also collapsed. “The sooner AusAID steps in, the better it will be for the bulk of the population who depend heavily on the bridge,” Awaita said.

The connection is palpable. PNG has been undergoing a transition through which an extraordinary proportion of public funds have been purloined by members of the elite, while 40 per cent of Papua New Guineans live on less than $US1 ($1.19) a day. This gap is being accelerated by the prospect of instant wealth around the corner from ExxonMobil’s $16.5 billion liquefied natural gas project, still four years from operation. The stress on the LNG deal has helped build a climate in which corruption appears to be viewed by some beneficiaries merely as booking private spending against future national earnings that are expected to be bottomless.

At the same time, government services have been declining, putting increased pressure on aid, especially from Australia, which the Rudd government is increasing in the next financial year, to $457m. The Rudd government meanwhile has cancelled the annual ministerial forum with PNG, due to limitations on ministerial travel in election year.

PNG Prime Minister Michael Somare, lionised globally as a Third World champion against climate change, a fortnight ago attended a conference on that issue in Norway. Last month while visiting New Zealand, he told the University of Auckland that LNG projects would “increase our revenue to an unprecedented level and transform PNG”, and that as a “big brother” to other Pacific island nations, PNG would be “in a position to provide development assistance within our region”.

But the country has been suffering widespread outbreaks of cholera during the past nine months, with more than 2600 cases so far, including 56 deaths, indicating poor sanitation and inadequate access to safe drinking water. Sales of fresh seafood have plummeted as people grow nervous of the disease, which has hit 573 people in Port Moresby.

Recently, the Papua New Guinea Post-Courier newspaper reported the pathology section of the main Angau Memorial Hospital in Lae, the country’s second city, is on the verge of collapse. Francis Bannick, the doctor in charge, describes the situation as desperate.

Lae has been unable to buy equipment needed urgently to enable pathology work to be carried out there — costing about $500,000 — replacing obsolete or broken machines. And medical specimens and biopsies instead sent to Port Moresby General Hospital for analysis have not received any response since September last year.

Recently, life expectancy has begun to decline and infant mortality to rise. Yet Health Minister Sasa Zibe has committed $9m towards a new high-end public-private Pacific Medical Centre in Port Moresby.

“The government, and many people, have been intoxicated by the anticipated wealth and opportunities of LNG. The nation is now feeling the effect of the early stages of the project. “The domestic cost structure has increased markedly. Many bad side effects will flow from the LNG-driven price inflation. Poverty will intensify, leading to other social problems.

“Many people have flown to Port Moresby from Southern Highlands, where the main gas field is located, seeking cash from various grants available from the government. Self-styled consultants are eagerly signing up such clients and representing them to government agencies, for commissions.

“There are enormous expectations,” says PNG Chamber of Mines and Petroleum executive director Greg Anderson, who stresses the need to manage them carefully. “There are dangers this could emerge as a huge cargo cult in the minds of many. “Government funds are already confirmed as a successful cargo cult that keeps on giving, with little downside for the beneficiaries.

Mowana Ugwalabu, general secretary of the PNG Teachers Association, said recently the teachers’ payroll list contains thousands of ghost names whose pay is going to outsiders while teachers struggle to get paid at all.

In March, Somare tabled in parliament the 818-page report of a separate commission of inquiry into corruption at the top levels of the bureaucracy, which was chaired by retired PNG judge Maurice Sheehan, a New Zealander, with fellow commissioners Cathy Davani and senior PNG businessman Don Manoa. But an injunction was granted banning the report’s publication and implementation as soon as it was tabled. And extraordinarily, the government has not sought so far to have the injunction lifted.

The government, however, has moved rapidly to pass legislation sheltering resource projects from all litigation over the destruction of the environment, labour abuse or landowner exploitation. This follows the growing anxiety of China’s Metallurgical Construction Corp, the developer of the $1.5bn Ramu nickel mine, about the effect of injunctions especially, recently, those granted to halt its construction of a pipeline to slurry tailings into the sea.

Deputy Opposition Leader Bart Philemon, a former treasurer, says the new legislation protects the interests of investors at the expense of the resource owners and the environment. Port Moresby Governor Powes Parkop says it delivers “almost absolute power to the government” on such matters.

Philemon says Somare is “dangling five carrots before the eyes” of backbench MPs to secure their support. Parliament last week approved the establishment of five new ministerial portfolios, thus bringing to 32 the cabinet positions, out of 109 MPs. Somare this week justified the new legislation, however, saying: “We cannot get mining going while this is in court. The Prime Minister’s Department has been held to ransom by [the judiciary]. The government will lose a lot [of money].” This is even though he has granted the Ramu project a 10-year tax holiday.

A clamour had arisen demanding the suspension of National Planning Minister Paul Tiensten over claims of corruption. Tiensten returned to his constituency. But Somare then sent the government’s Falcon jet to bring Tiensten back in triumph to Port Moresby.

The Supreme Court chalked up a win over the government recently, however, in insisting on the suspension of Treasurer Patrick Pruaitch following his indictment by the Ombudsman Commission for corruption. Justice Nicholas Kirriwom said in awarding the decision against Pruaitch — overturning an earlier stay order — that “for a leader to remain in office when he has been referred [to a leadership tribunal] is a mockery of the constitution”.

Legislation to water down the powers of the Ombudsman Commission, which polices corruption, has been backed by the government. But it was postponed to later in the year following mass demonstrations.

Morauta warns: “If the Ombudsman Commission goes, there is no country.” Somare says there is no intention to remove the commission, describing the demonstrators as “ol long long” (they’re mad).

Paul Barker, executive director of the Institute of National Affairs, PNG’s independent think tank, says: “The few reformers within the government seem to have inadequate political and bureaucratic backing to push through the massive changes needed for government to contribute rather than be a dead weight to a productive and inclusive economy and society.


By mid September everything should have been locked and loaded with Bill for the Clinton Global Initiative's public announcement of its support for the Pacific Medical Centre in Port Moresby.  After all, it was "precisely the kind of public private healthcare partnership the Clinton Foundation supports right around the world".
What an extraordinary coincidence that Bill's Global Initiative was going to announce this huge Pacific Medical Centre for Papua New Guinea just before an extraordinary visit to PNG by the US Secretary of State!
Fortunately it appears that a few old timers in the US State Dept Ethics Division actually had ethics.
The Clinton Foundation couldn't avoid submitting the details of its proposed support for the Pacific Medical Centre. It had been splashed throughout the papers and given the Secretary of State's visit the project must have been highly visible in briefing papers from the Embassy.   It's significant that Clinton destroyed thousands of emails on her personal servers and thousands of those remain "missing".   There must have been briefing notes about the hospital and there were clear cut ethical issues arising from it for the Clintons.
Around this time a conflict of interest report was completed by the Clinton Foundation and delivered into the Department of State's Ethics approval process.
On 27 August 2010 this chain of internal US State Department communications commenced.
Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 12.48.03 pm
Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 12.59.30 pm Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 12.48.33 pm

This one called for the big guns.
James Thessin was the US State Department's big boss of ethics.
Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 1.12.46 pm
Thessin joined the State Department in 1982 as attorney-adviser for Political-Military Affairs.. rom 1984-85, he served as Assistant Legal Adviser for Human Rights and Refugee Affairs. In 1986 he began working as assistant legal advisor for managaement. He also joined the Office of Government Ethics, and in 1990 he was named the State Department’s Designated Agency Ethics Official.
Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 1.15.00 pm Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 1.15.24 pm Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 1.16.43 pm Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 12.48.42 pm Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 12.48.54 pm

The experienced lawyer Violanda Botet wrote to the chief of Ethics for the State Department "Jim here's a request from the Clinton Foundation that you will want to review more carefully". 
The veteran Jim involved the East Asia Pacific Principal Assistant Deputy Secretary to get his views.
And the Clinton Foundation's support for and involvement with Michael Somare's Pacific Medical Centre sank without a trace.
Wonder where the $20M facilitation fund from November 2009 went................

All Clinton Foundation O/S deals required US State Department Ethics Dept approval while Hillary was Secretary

You only need to glance at the notes from her team planning day in January 2010 to see the potential conflicts of interest between Hillary Clinton's responsibilities as US Secretary of State and the aggressive global solicitation of money by the Clinton Foundation.

In 2007/8 Clinton battled with Barack Obama for nomination as the Democrats presidential candidate.

As part of a murky agreement with the Obama camp, Clinton withdrew and was made US Secretary of State - with some strict conditions.

So allow the lady herself to explain the situation.

Screen Shot 2016-08-29 at 11.23.00 pm Screen Shot 2016-08-29 at 11.23.10 pm Screen Shot 2016-08-29 at 11.23.18 pm

The United States Government is regulated by the "Committee for the Federal Register".  It holds in writing a list of United States Code sections, Statutes at Large, Public Laws, and Presidential Documents, which provide rulemaking authority applying to government officials and their powers/responsibilities.

The is the Section that applied to Bill Clinton during Hillary's time as Secretary of State.

(a) Consideration of appearances by the employee.

Where an employee knows that a particular matter involving specific parties is likely to have a direct and predictable effect on the financial interest of a member of his household, or knows that a person with whom he has a covered relationship is or represents a party to such matter, and where the employee determines that the circumstances would cause a reasonableperson with knowledge of the relevant facts to question his impartiality in the matter, the employee should not participate in the matter unless he has informed the agency designee of the appearance problem and received authorization from the agency designee in accordance withparagraph (d) of this section.

(1) In considering whether a relationship would cause a reasonable person to question his impartiality, an employee may seek the assistance of his supervisor, an agency ethics official or the agency designee.

(2) An employee who is concerned that circumstances other than those specifically described in this section would raise a question regarding his impartiality should use the process described in this section to determine whether he should or should not participate in a particular matter.


On 12 December 2008 the Clinton Foundation and President-elect Obama's "office" signed a memorandum of understanding - we discussed the document and in particular the ramifications for Rudd here.

The MOU obliged the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton to do a number of things:

  • Publish the names and amounts given by donors
  • Separately incorporate and spin off the Clinton Global Initiative - with Bill Clinton excluded from holding an officer or director role or any fiduciary connection with the new entity
  • Bill Clinton not to solicit funds for the Foundation
  • CGI not to accept funds from foreign governments
  • Prior to any arm of the Foundation entering any paid contract with an entity from any foreign country, the details of the proposed transaction are to be given to the State Department Ethics Office for independent review. The State Department Ethics office will then send the matter for review to the White House Ethics Counsel.  Both Clinton and the Clinton Foundation agree to be bound by the Ethics Office decisions.

That means that every single speech, every contract, every Sir Michael Somare hair-brained scheme had to be sent to the Ethicists for prior approval.

I have read every document supplied to Judicial Watch by the US State Department in compliance with a US Court order.

Sadly most of them are heavily redacted - most of the 3 pages in this "Saudi Entities" request for approval are whited out, redacted for the allowable reason B5 under the US FOI provisions:

Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 2.15.41 am

For almost all of the requests the best case information is something like this:

Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 2.09.31 am Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 2.09.43 am

After spending so much time with these documents I'm getting some feel for the way the process flowed.

As an example on 14 June, 2010 Hillary Clinton made a major policy announcement as US Secretary of State about sub-Saharan Africa.

Clinton's Remarks on Sub-Saharan Africa, June 2010

Speaker: Hillary Rodham Clinton
Published June 14, 2010

Secretary of State Clinton gave these remarks and press conference on June 14, 2010 in Washington, DC.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Good afternoon, everyone. Well, thank you all very much and welcome again. I know you’ve been welcomed over and over again, but it’s a delight to have you here in the State Department for this briefing on Sub-Saharan Africa and the issues that affect the countries in that region and our relationship with them.......

.......We’ve also made a major commitment to improving health in Africa. In addition to continuing the fight against HIV/AIDS, malaria, TB, and polio, the Obama Administration has pledged $63 billion over five years for all of our health programs. And we are paying particular attention to Africa and especially to the health of women and children.


And where was the Clinton Foundation?

Bill Clinton was in South Africa for the World Cup which started 11 June 2010.  As his tour progressed something caused more than a ripple of concern for the US State Department's ethics people.

Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 2.46.18 am


Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 2.46.24 am Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 2.46.51 am Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 2.46.57 am

Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 2.47.10 am

Many proud men and women have made wonderful contributions to the world through years of service as diplomats and other officers in the US State Department's embassies, missions and aid agencies.

I'm sure the good and sensible amongst their number would have been keen to avoid optics like this - compare and contrast the US Secretary of State's official arrival at Bogota Colombia representing the US Government with the grainy photo alongside Bill later that night.



Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 2.32.51 am

In our next instalment we come back to PNG's Michael Somare and the illusory Port Moresby super-hospital.

Be warned - the grubbiness will leave you wanting a long hot shower.

A brief judicial summary on The Clintons and their global racketeering corrupt organisation

Under Kevin Rudd you and I paid $10M in a donation to the Clinton Foundation - so Bill Clinton could introduce Rudd as 'one of the smartest leaders in the world today'.

Under Julia Gillard you and I paid $14M in a donation to the Clinton Foundation - so Gillard could be set up as the Global Partnership for Education Chair with its flow on benefits.

The Clinton Foundation has corrupted our polity and people.  They stole our money.   This is our problem.

Judicial Watch in the US is a wonderful institution.  Australia owes it a debt most of us will never understand.

Judicial Watch holds the powerful to account when no one else will.   We would not have known what the Clintons were up to were it not for Judicial Watch.

I've spent the weekend and today reading all of the subpoenaed emails, letters and other Exhibits produced by Order of the US Court on an Application made by Judicial Watch.

It takes a while for the Clinton course of conduct to sink in - but when it does and you start to understand what the Clintons did you'll never look at any politician in the same way you used to.

This scandal will change you.

This weekly synopsis from Judicial Watch was released Saturday our time.

If you don't have time to read the details in what I'm posting in my small little patch of Clinton Foundation research (ie Australia and our neighbours) read this weekly report from Judicial Watch.

And thank your God that there are still people who value the democracy and freedoms our forebears fought and died for enough to risk taking on The Clintons.


Screen Shot 2016-08-29 at 10.14.15 pm

Weekly Update: Shocking Clinton News

AUGUST 26, 2016

New Emails: Clinton’s State Department Gave Special Access to Foundation Donors
Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Email Questions under Oath 
JW Forces Release of “Deleted” Clinton Emails – Hidden Emails Include Benghazi Material 
Court Victory for Election Integrity
JW’s New Book Clean House Coming Next Week


New Emails: Clinton’s State Department Gave Special Access to Foundation Donors

The true nature of the Clinton Foundation becomes ever clearer with each discovery of withheld emails. 

This week we released 725 pages of State Department documents that include email exchanges in which Hillary Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin provided influential Clinton Foundation donors special, expedited access to the secretary of state.

In one flagrant example, the Crown Prince of Bahrain was forced to go through the Clinton Foundation to get access to the secretary of state. He got it after pledging $32 million to the Clinton Global Initiative.

The new documents included 20 Hillary Clinton email exchanges not previously turned over to the State Department, bringing the known total to date to 191 of new Clinton emails (not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over to the State Department). These records further appear to contradict statements by Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department.

The Abedin emails reveal that she apparently served as a conduit between Clinton Foundation donors and Hillary Clinton while Clinton served as secretary of state. In more than a dozen email exchanges, Abedin provided expedited, direct access to Clinton for donors who had contributed from $25,000 to $10 million. In many instances, Clinton Foundation top executive Doug Band, who worked with the Foundation throughout Hillary Clinton’s tenure at State, coordinated closely with Abedin. In Abedin’s June deposition to Judicial Watch, she conceded that part of her job at the State Department was taking care of “Clinton family matters.”

Among the Abedin-Band emails is an exchange revealing that when Crown Prince Salman of Bahrain requested a meeting with Clinton, he was forced to go through the Clinton Foundation for an appointment. Abedin advised Band that when she went through “normal channels” at State, Clinton declined to meet. After Band intervened, however, the meeting was set up within forty-eight hours.

According to the Clinton Foundation website, in 2005, Salman committed to establishing the Crown Prince’s International Scholarship Program (CPISP) for the Clinton Global Initiative. And by 2010, it had contributed $32 million to CGI. The Kingdom of Bahrain reportedly gave between $50,000 and $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation. And Bahrain Petroleum also gave an additional $25,000 to $50,000.

From: Doug Band

To: Huma Abedin

Sent: Tue Jun 23 1:29:42 2009


Cp of Bahrain in tomorrow to Friday

Asking to see her

Good friend of ours


From: Huma Abedin

To: Doug Band

Sent: Tue Jun 23 4:12:46 2009

Subject: Re:

He asked to see hrc thurs and fri thru normal channels. I asked and she said she doesn’t want to commit to anything for thurs or fri until she knows how she will feel. Also she says that she may want to go to ny and doesn’t want to be committed to stuff in ny…


FromHuma Abedin [[email protected]]

Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:35:15 AM

To: Doug Band


Offering Bahrain cp 10 tomorrow for meeting woith [sic] hrc

If u see him, let him know

We have reached out thru official channels

Also included among the Abedin-Band emails is an exchange in which Band urged Abedin to get the Clinton State Department to intervene in order to obtain a visa for members of the Wolverhampton (UK) Football Club, one of whose members was apparently having difficulty because of a “criminal charge.” Band was acting at the behest of Casey Wasserman, a millionaire Hollywood sports entertainment executive and President of the Wasserman Foundation. Wasserman has donated between $5 million and $10 million to the Clinton Foundation through the Wasserman Foundation.

The Abedin emails also reveal that Slimfast tycoon S. Daniel Abraham was granted almost immediate access to then-Secretary of State Clinton, with Abedin serving as the facilitator. According to the Clinton Foundation website, Abraham, like the Wasserman Foundation, has given between $5 million and $10 million to the Clinton Foundation. The emails indicate that Abraham was granted almost immediate access to Clinton upon request.

Additional Abedin emails in which the top Clinton aide intervenes with the State Department on behalf of Clinton Foundation donors include the following:

  • On Friday, June 26, 2009, Clinton confidant Kevin O’Keefe wrote to Clinton saying that “Kevin Conlon is trying to set up a meeting with you and a major client.” Clinton wrote to Abedin, “Can you help deliver these for Kevin?” Abedin responded, “I’ll look into it asap” Kevin O’Keefe donated between $10,000 and $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Kevin Conlon is a Clinton presidential campaign “Hillblazer” who has raised more than $100,000 for the candidate.
  • On Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Ben Ringel wrote to Abedin, “I’m on shuttle w Avigdor Liberman. I called u back yesterday. I want to stop by to see hrc tonite for 10 mins.” Ringel donated between $10,000 and $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
  • On Monday, July 6, 2009, Maureen White wrote to Abedin, “I am going to be in DC on Thursday. Would she have any time to spare?” Abedin responded, “Yes I’ll make it work.” White donated $75,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
  • In June 2009, prominent St. Louis political power broker Joyce Aboussie exchanged a series of insistent emails with Abedin concerning Aboussie’s efforts to set up a meeting between Clinton and Peabody Energy VP Cartan Sumner. Aboussie wrote, “Huma, I need your help now to intervene please. We need this meeting with Secretary Clinton, who has been there now for nearly six months. This is, by the way, my first request. I really would appreciate your help on this. It should go without saying that the Peabody folks came to Dick [Gephardt] and I because of our relationship with the Clinton’s.” After further notes from Aboussie, Abedin responded, “We are working on it and I hope we can make something work… we have to work through the beauracracy [sic] here.” Aboussie donated between $100,000 and $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
  • On Saturday, May 16, 2009, mobile communications executive and political activist Jill Iscol wrote to Clinton, “Please advise to whom I should forward Jacqueline Novogratz’s request [for a meeting with the secretary of state]. I know you know her, but honestly, she is so far ahead of the curve and brilliant I believe she could be enormously helpful to your work.” Clinton subsequently sent an email to Abedin saying, “Pls print.” Jill and husband Ken Iscol donated between $500,000 and $1 million to the Clinton Foundation. Clinton subsequently appointed Novogratz to the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Policy Board.

The newly obtained Abedin emails also contain a memorandum sent to Cheryl Mills from State Department White House liaison Laura Pena revealing that Rajiv Fernando was proposed for his controversial appointment to the sensitive International Security Advisory Board as early as June 2009. Fernando was not actually appointed until 2011, and his appointment raised a firestorm because, according to an ABC News report, “he had no obvious experience in the field.” Fernando donated $1 million to the Clinton Foundation.

The Abedin emails reveal that even U2’s Bono got into the act when former Bill Clinton aide Ben Schwerin, who helped set up the Clinton Foundation, urged Abedin to help the aging rock star broadcast from the international space station. In a May 27, 2009, email with the subject line “Bono/NASA,” Schwerin wrote, “Bono wants to do linkup with the international space station on every show during the tour this year.… Any ideas? Thks.” Bono has been a donor to the Clinton Global Initiative. And in 2011, he gathered top entertainers for “A Decade of Difference: A Concert Celebrating 10 Years of the William J. Clinton Foundation.” According to USA Today, “Some tickets were sold to the public for $50 to $550, and premium seats went for $1,000 to $5,000 on the Foundation website.”

This is the tenth set of records produced for Judicial Watch by the State Department from the email accounts of Huma Abedin. The documents were produced under a court order in a May 5, 2015, Freedom of Information (FOIA) lawsuit against the State Department (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00684)) requiring the agency to produce “all emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013, using a ‘non-state’.gov email address.”

Hillary Clinton has repeatedly stated that she believes that the 55,000 pages of documents she turned over to the State Department in December 2014 included all of her work-related emails. In response to a court order in other Judicial Watch litigation, she declared under penalty of perjury that she had “directed that all my emails on in my custody that were or are potentially federal records be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done.” This new email find is also at odds with her official campaign statement suggesting all “work or potentially work-related emails” were provided to the State Department.

In these emails we are seeing the most blatant abuse ever of a cabinet office. Hillary Clinton turned the State Department into a global revenue stream that enriched her private interests with millions of ill-gotten dollars. The scope of this pay-for-play corruption is simply staggering.

The release of this material caused another national firestorm, with lead stories in the Washington PostNew York Times, and widespread television news coverage.   Liberals and conservatives have called for special prosecutors and for the Clinton Foundation to be shut down.  Yet, incredibly, JW made even more news than this on the Clinton email story this past week.


Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Email Questions under Oath

Unlike Hillary Clinton and her allies in the Obama administration, federal courts tend to take the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) quite seriously.

Late last Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan’s granted us permission to submit interrogatories to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and to depose the former Director of Information Resource Management of the Executive Secretariat (“S/ES-IRM”) John Bentel.

The court order reads:

[T] the State Department shall release all remaining documents responsive to Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act request by no later than September 30, 2016; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that, consistent with Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Judicial Watch may serve interrogatories on Secretary Clinton by no later than October 14, 2016 … Secretary Clinton’s responses are due by no later than thirty days thereafter … Judicial Watch may depose Mr. Bentel by no later than October 31, 2016.

In his opinion Judge Sullivan writes:

The Court is persuaded that Secretary Clinton’s testimony is necessary to enable her to explain on the record the purpose for the creation and operation of the system for State Department business.

On July 8, Judicial Watch submitted a request for permission to depose Clinton; the Director of Office of Correspondence and Records of the Executive Secretariat (“S/ES-CRM”) Clarence Finney; and Bentel. The request arises in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit before Judge Sullivan that seeks records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former Deputy Chief of Staff to Clinton. The lawsuit was reopened because of revelations about the system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)).

Though we still think an in-person deposition is appropriate, we are pleased by the Court’s authorizing us to learn more about Clinton’s email practices from Mrs. Clinton – under oath.  We will move quickly to get answers.  If things stay on track, we should have answers from Mrs. Clinton, under oath, by the end of next month.  This decision – and the astonishing story below – is a reminder that Hillary Clinton is not above the law and that at least one federal court thinks she hasn’t answered all the outstanding questions about her emails.


JW Forces Release of “Deleted” Clinton Emails – Hidden Emails Include Benghazi Material

Our work on the Clinton emails issue yields incredible result after incredible result.  Just yesterday, a federal court ordered the State Department to review newly found Clinton emails and turn over responsive records by September 13.  And, in two other Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits, the State Department is scheduled to release additional emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s email system beginning September 30.  As if this wasn’t enough, in a court filing this week, the State Department admitted it had found Benghazi-related documents among the 14,900 Clinton emails and attachments uncovered by the FBI that Mrs. Clinton deleted and withheld from the State Department.

The first batch of new emails comes in response to a court order issued yesterday in a November 13, 2015, Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed against the Department of State seeking all communications between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama White House from the day of the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi and throughout the following week.  The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Dr. Larry Kawa of Boca Raton, Florida, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach Division (Larry Kawa v. U.S. Department of State (No. 9:15-cv-81560)).  Yesterday’s order requiring the production of the emails from the 14,900 new Clinton emails, as well as any other communications or emails from the other materials recently delivered to the State Department by the FBI, was issued by U.S. District Court Judge William P. Dimitrouleas.  The court ruled:

The State Department shall search the material, determine whether any responsive records exist, and complete its first production of non-exempt records, to the extent any exist, by September 13, 2016.

In a separate case, JW has been seeking Clinton’s communications about the attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, during which U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith were killed.  A second assault targeted a nearby compound, killing two government contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00692)).

After admitting in an August 23 court filing that it found documents that “satisfied the [Benghazi related] search terms” of the new Clinton emails, the State Department proposed a rolling production schedule, “under which State would make its first production of any non-exempt responsive records subject to FOIA on September 30, 2016, and complete production no later than October 31, 2016.”  Judicial Watch then asked the court that State make known the volume of documents remaining to be reviewed before it accepts whether the production schedule is reasonable.  And then – also yesterday – U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta informed the attorneys the Court wants to schedule a hearing on this issue for Tuesday, August 30!

There’s more.  We are also scheduled to receive documents from the State Department in a case arising out of FOIA lawsuit before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan that seeks records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former Deputy Chief of Staff to Clinton.  The lawsuit was reopened because of revelations about the system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)).  Judge Sullivan ordered the State Department to release all remaining documents responsive to our FOIA request by no later than September 30, 2016.

The 14,900 new Clinton emails were uncovered as a result of separate Judicial Watch litigation seeking all of Mrs. Clinton’s work-related emails.  At a status hearing this week, U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the State Department to report to the Court the volume of documents reviewed and be prepared to commit to a production schedule at a further status hearing on September 23, 2016.  The revelation of the existence of all these additional emails further rocked the nation.

It is difficult to overstate how scandalous it is that Hillary Clinton tried to delete and hide Benghazi emails and documents.  No wonder federal courts in Florida and DC are ordering the State Department to stop stalling and begin releasing the 14,900 new Clinton emails.

Screen Shot 2016-08-29 at 10.51.20 pm

The Clinton Foundation corrupted our polity and people. They stole our money. This is our problem.

In these two videos you'll see men who have personally done all of the detailed work needed to form a view about The Clinton Foundation frauds.

I've been in close and regular contact with Charles Ortel for more than one year now.

We owe you big time Charles.  Through you and your continued relentless focus I've come to understand how our politicians sold out and are today selling out our core values to the Clinton Foundation and what it represents.

Special access to jobs, immunity from prosecutions, access to the heart of the legislature and executive - in short some of the top-tier privileges our civilisation reserves for the worthy were sold by The Clintons to people with enough money.  More often than not the money to access the Clinton Foundation's personal benefits program was taken from taxpayers.

Kevin Rudd did it.

Julia Gillard did it.

Julie Bishop is doing it now.

So with great respect to you - listen up!  You owe it to the rest of us to understand what these people did to us.


Trey Gowdy once again showing the value of doing the reading, understanding the issues and getting into the details - compare and contrast Trey's comments with the Twitter informed "there's no smoking gun and that Foundation did really good work" apologists.


Under Kevin Rudd you and I paid $10M in a donation to the Clinton Foundation - so Bill Clinton could introduce Rudd as 'one of the smartest leaders in the world today'.

Under Julia Gillard you and I paid $14M in a donation to the Clinton Foundation - so Gillard could be set up as the Global Partnership for Education Chair with its flow on benefits.

The Clinton Foundation has corrupted our polity and people.  They stole our money.   This is our problem.

Catching up with Ralph Blewitt tomorrow - working on the Clinton Foundation tonight

I had a good chat with Ralph Blewitt on the phone today.
I've not seen Ralph in person for a few months and I'm very pleased that we've plans to get together face to face tomorrow.  There's still a hell of a long way to go with the AWU Scandal which is yet to result in even the most preliminary of police interviews with the offenders.
I want you to know that my personal commitment to seeing through what I started in the investigation and prosecution of The AWU Scandal crimes and crooks hasn't altered one bit.
While we were chatting today Ralph hesitated a little before introducing the...."mate I hope you don't mind me saying this, but lots of people I know are mentioning how they're sick of the Clinton stuff....." etc etc
The immediate response Ralph elicited from me surprised me a bit and I thought I'd share it with you.
I told Ralph that I was acutely aware that there's not that much interest in the arcane Clinton Foundation minutiae.  I said that I knew that my numbers were going down and I was diluting support for the site as a result of the time, effort and coverage I've given the Clinton Foundation inquiry.  The Clinton matter is complex and each incremental step is so time consuming - I've not encountered anything like it before.
If I was publishing this blog with the goal of having as many readers as possible I would not pursue the Clinton inquiry.   But I have to follow my convictions and sense of what's right - and at the moment the greatest and most outrageous direct threat to us and our traditions is the quiet acceptance of terrible crimes and special protections associated with chosen members of The Left .
The Clintons are at the top of that pyramid.   They stole our money.   They were helped by Rudd and Gillard.  Rudd and Gillard personally benefitted too.  
I said to Ralph and asked that he pass it on to his friends, "How could any decent person who believes what I believe about the Clinton Frauds simply do nothing about it?"
I am not aware of anyone else doing what I'm doing.  If not me, who?  If not now, when?  
I truly fear for the consequences of the unstopped march of this Clinton/Gillard etc movement.  Look at the subversion of the US Justice system to write Hillary out of obvious and very serious criminal offences.  When the populace gets wind that she got away with things others are in gaol for we will suffer terrible consequences.
My God I hope I'm doing the right thing in pursuing this inquiry.   At the very least, I know I'm doing it for the right reasons.
The evidence in The AWU Scandal isn't going away, but nor is time standing still.  In a few weeks Hillary Clinton could be elected President of the United States.  
I want to use those weeks wisely.

Aspiring journalists, prosecutors and parliamentarians - study Trey Gowdy at work

Trey is one of those rare people who says what he believes to be true.

Not what he's been told is true.  Not what everyone else thinks is true.

I admire him because conventional wisdom means nothing to him.

He relies on his own scholarship and reasoning to inform his opinions.

Most people go through life trying to look good, reduce risk and survive.

For most people the most important thing is to be right.

Trey Gowdy is not like them.

Perhaps the most important characteristic in Gowdy's make up is the courage to stick to his convictions and principles regardless of what others say.

Even if that means he hasn't the time to find a decent barber - nobody's perfect!