UPDATED - constructive analysis on the police response to London Bridge Islamic terror attack
Thursday, 08 June 2017
Footage of the London Bridge terrorists attacking people. People need to see this . I won't apologise for sharing it pic.twitter.com/aPuX0gQgJ5
— Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 7, 2017
That poor man, just out to get something from the shop or cafe - 8 minutes response time for armed police must have seemed like an eternity for those poor people who happened to be in the path of Muhammad's clones.
Let me say up front that these police should be congratulated on their courage and commitment.
The police response however evinces a dangerous lack of training and overdoses of adrenaline.
The police are all over each other's lines of fire - but put that subtlety to one side for a moment.
I can vividly remember my first few times in car chases or turning up to the scene of a call of "offenders on premises" or similar.
The adrenaline is pumping and everything is a bit of a blur.
But police and citizens die because of a lack of training like that.
For what it's worth, it shouldn't be extraordinary for British police to be armed.
It should be normal.
No police officer in Australia leaves a police station without a weapon.
I can't imagine any Australian police officer attending a call like the one above and failing to secure the police vehicle.
I hate to criticise police like this - and I'd like to make clear that my criticism isn't aimed at the blokes who attended the grisly scene above. It's at their training and the idea that carrying a firearm is something exceptional.
Sadly, for all police it must be so normal it's like using a pen.
Or shutting the door of the police car.
UPDATE
I've asked a couple of mates for their constructive opinions on the video above.
You might remember LTCOL Kyle Tyrrell - we reported on Kyle's adventures with some now broken men on the beach in Victoria a while back.
Kyle's just dropped us an email:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for asking for my comment on the footage you provided of the Police response to the London Bridge Terrorist Attack.
- The obvious willingness of officers to move toward the danger…the culture of courage
- Communications… from first call to elimination of the threat was 8 minutes..this points to a very robust comms environment
- Speed of deployment…officers / units were obviously well positioned and knew their area of operations
- Surveillance…It is assumed that the speedy direction of officers onto the target was assisted by CCTV coverage of the area
- Force Projection…The police were able to deploy at least 6 officers to the incident very quickly
- The response appeared to be “panicky”…the police vehicle was not secured and appeared to roll into the incident because the handbrake was not applied.
- The car did not appear to be positioned tactically (to afford safe deployment from the vehicle and provide a tactical advantage to the officers)
- Deployment from the vehicle appeared to be haphazard (not according to a pre-determined drill)… they just piled out and ran to the target without any real awareness of where the rest of their team was.
- The Police were myopic…every officer zeroed in on the obvious threat…who was “securing” the “flanks and rear” to prevent interdiction from another “threat” or to ensure civilians stayed away from the threat.
- Officers crossed each others lines on a number of occasions, some officers getting way too close to the target and one ended up going to ground with a terrorist.
- It was obvious that they weren’t trained as a team…there were no clear roles…they all zeroed in on the target.
- Officers arriving on the scene after the threat was neutralized barreled straight into the area and crossed lines of fire of officers who had already clearly neutralized the threat. Once again suggesting a lack of tactical command structure and team tactics, techniques and procedures.
- Training, Training, Training…individual weapon skills, team skills / drills, Tactics, Techniques and Procedures
My view less condemning, cannot expect Hollywood perfection. These police got job done and well. Courage and controlled aggression on show https://t.co/2jSBB3IfEh
— Jim Molan (@Jim_Molan) June 7, 2017
Major General Andrew James "Jim" Molan AO, DSC (born 11 April 1950) is a former senior officer in the Australian Army.
During his career he was Commanding Officer of the 6th Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment, Commander of the Army's mechanised 1st Brigade, Commander of the 1st Division and its Deployable Joint Force Headquarters, and the Commander of the Australian Defence College. In April 2004, he deployed for a year to Iraq to serve as the Chief of Operations for the new Headquarters Multinational Force in Iraq. He was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross by the Australian Government, and the Legion of Merit by the United States Government. In August 2008 Molan released his first book, Running the War in Iraq.
ENDS
And this from former NSW Police officer Peter Wallace
It is a significant error. Can't say I ever saw it even once. And at such close quarters, I think I'd prefer a pistol.
— 🇦🇺 Peter Wallace (@PeterWallaceAU) June 7, 2017