Compare & contrast Clinton's clandestine Communist China communications with Trump's Russian rendezvous
Thursday, 13 July 2017
Why aren't the same standards placed on the Democrats. Look what Hillary Clinton may have gotten away with. Disgraceful!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 12, 2017
Never have the different standards in news reporting been clearer.
If it's about Clinton/the Left and it's bad - it's not newsworthy.
If it's about Trump/the Right it doesn't even have to be bad.
Vague innuendo will do; as long as Trump or his nearest have done something - anything - well it must be bad, OK?
I've been wondering why the Trump Jr meeting with a woman from Russia is such a huge drama.
So here's the Wall Street Journal's finest,
Trump Jr. Meeting Spells Trouble for Trump Team
7/11/2017 6:00AM
Seib's analysis boils down to 3 points.
OK - so the problem is it looks like collaboration, it suggests previous denials of meetings with Russia weren't true and that begs the question - what else is out there?
Thanks scoop!
Now apply those points to Clinton.
Here's an email that - other than on our website - has had absolutely no reporting at all.
It details a private meeting between Hillary Clinton's campaign chief John Podesta with Chinese ambassador at 3rd party's home - in January last year.