Previous month:
December 2017
Next month:
February 2018

January 2018

New Crocodile Dundee movie - too much fun for censorious left

Here's the trailer for the new Crocodile Dundee movie - it looks like a bit of fun.


Apparently too much fun for The Guardian's Luke Buckmaster.

Here's a tip Luke.

It's a movie mate.  We can laugh at stuff in movies.

Remember Planet of the Apes?  Just because apes started running the show in the movie, the real world wasn't suddenly run by apes.

If we piss ourselves laughing at an outback figure dealing with New York trendies - it doesn't mean we're all going to start grabbing other people's crotches.

Get it Luke?  Movie.  Not How-To-Live-Your-Life-Instructional-DVD-Box-Set.

A good mate of mine in the media read your piece and suggested a new headline.

“Strange looking genY hipster writes pointless article to get attention.”

Screen Shot 2018-01-23 at 6.28.19 pm


in addition to being vulgar and witless, the new film would need to be sexist, racist, homophobic and transphobic. It would need to have awkward jokes unfunny at the time of release and even less amusing when revisited years later.

Take, for example, a scene from the original film, based in a pub in New York. Mick Dundee (Hogan) chats up a trans woman, before a friend pulls him aside: “I’ve been trying to tell you all night, that girl, she’s a guy!” Dundee responds by sexual assaulting her. He grabs the woman in the groin area, then points and yells: “A guy dressed up like a sheila! Look at that!”

The pub erupts into laughter and applause. There are high fives and back slaps.

Dundee sexually assaults another women later on, in the same way, at an art gallery. His love interest Sue (Linda Kozlowski) consoles the distraught woman by saying: “It’s OK, he’s Australian.”

In the 1988 sequel, which manages to be both offensive and boring, the protagonist steps out on a ledge in a skyscraper, to convince a suicidal man not to jump. The broken-hearted fellow tells him: “I loved that bitch.” Dundee consoles the stranger and gives him a hug.

Crocodile Dundee II
The 1988 sequel ‘manages to be both offensive and boring’. Photograph: Allstar/Paramount/Sportsphoto Ltd/Allstar

When the man continues to reflect on his lover, adding “he betrayed me”, Dundee is so shocked to learn the man is gay that he recoils from their embrace and nearly falls off the building. The strong implication is that, had he known the man was homosexual, he would never have tried to save him in the first place.

Sue, a journalist, initially appears to have a reasonable amount of agency, before we learn she is dating her editor and her father is the publisher. During a quiet scene in the original movie (directed by Peter Faiman and written by Hogan, Ken Shadie and John Cornell), Sue complains to Dundee about a previous lover. She says this guy is a lefty type, “probably marching right now, for the gay Nazis or something”.

Dundee, disgusted, tells her he “sounds like a prize ratbag”. He then discusses land rights and Indigenous Australians. They “don’t own the land, they belong to it”, he says, going on to compare people discussing land ownership to “fleas” debating “who owns the dog”.

The Crocodile Dundee films were phenomenally popular at home (where the original is still the most successful of all time) and in the US. Box Office Mojo estimates the trilogy grossed about US$700m (adjusted for inflation), in addition to a whopping amount accumulated on ancillary markets.

Designed to appeal to US audiences first and foremost, and subsequently exploiting Australia’s inferiority complex, Crocodile Dundee confirmed false preconceptions Americans had (and perhaps still have) about Australia and Australians. These movies constructed a conservative fantasy, where white hetero males do all the hard work and are justly rewarded, and where everybody else, including “the sheilas”, “the Aborigines” and “the gays”, understand their place in the pecking order – which is somewhere below people like Dundee.

The writers are unsure whether to paint Dundee as a Barry McKenzie-esque decorum destroyer, flying in the face of decency and politeness, or a fearless knife-wielding action hero. He is subsequently both, and neither. You can’t take Dundee seriously as a hero, nor laugh away what he says and does as the behaviour of an idiot and a blunderbuss.

There is a suggestion the man’s sometimes casual, at other times brusquely direct racism and sexism is acceptable because he doesn’t know any better. At the same time we are told he is some kind of mystically minded genius, because he was raised by a tribe of Indigenous Australians. This apparently gives Dundee the right to speak on their behalf, and rib them in various ways.

“Now look who’s the white man!” Dundee says to an Indigenous friend in the third film, Crocodile Dundee in Los Angeles, when his pal answers a call on his mobile phone (hilarious!). The jokes generally either belittle minority groups, or poke fun at Dundee himself.

These are cynical, opportunistic films, dripping with contempt for their audience. From this point of view, there is one thing the new “trailer” gets absolutely right: it encapsulates the franchise’s shameless stereotype-mongering and disdainful attitude towards viewers. All in an ultra-efficient two words, when Danny McBride stares into the camera and says: “G’day, losers.”


Neil Diamond retires from touring - diagnosed with Parkinsons - thanks for the memories of a lifetime!

For you dad.

My dad loved Neil Diamond.

This was the setlist from Neil's Sydney concert, 29 March 1996, the day of Dad's funeral.



    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
    Play Video
  28. Encore:
    Play Video
    Play Video



JANUARY 22, 2018



Legendary Artist Will Continue To

Write, Record & Pursue New Projects

Legendary singer, songwriter and performer Neil Diamond today announced his retirement from touring due to his recent diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. The onset of the disease has made it difficult to travel and perform on a large scale basis but will allow Mr. Diamond to continue his writing, recording and development of new projects. Based on his doctors’ advice, the third leg of Diamond’s 50th Anniversary tour, set to land in Australia and New Zealand this March, has been cancelled.

“It is with great reluctance and disappointment that I announce my retirement from concert touring. I have been so honored to bring my shows to the public for the past 50 years,” said Neil Diamond.”My sincerest apologies to everyone who purchased tickets and were planning to come to the upcoming shows.

I plan to remain active in writing, recording and other projects for a long time to come.

My thanks goes out to my loyal and devoted audiences around the world. You will always have my appreciation for your support and encouragement. This ride has been ‘so good, so good, so good’ thanks to you.”

The Australia and New Zealand leg of the 50th Anniversary tour (announced by TEG DAINTY in November, 2017) was scheduled to visit a number of outdoor stadiums as well as arena and winery shows in Australia and New Zealand. This would have been the third leg of the 50th Anniversary tour with Diamond selling out shows in the U.S. and Europe throughout 2017.

In making the announcement, Paul Dainty, President and CEO of TEG Dainty stated: “I am devastated and saddened to hear the news of Neil’s illness and his retirement from touring. I have had the honour of promoting Neil’s numerous tours in Australia and New Zealand, he is one of the world’s greatest artists and we and his thousands and thousands of fans here will miss seeing him tour down under.”

On January 24th, Diamond will celebrate his 77th birthday and on January 28th The Recording Academy will honor him with its prestigious Lifetime Achievement Award.


Credit & Debit Card -Tickets purchased by credit or debit card will be refunded in full (including your ticket insurance premium, if relevant) and you do not need to take any action. Please allow up to 10 working days for the refund to appear in your account.

Cash & Eftpos -Patrons who purchased tickets with cash or EFTPOS, Ticketek will be in contact to arrange a refund.

Contact: Deborah Radel at DRPR: [email protected]

Bombing at market in Thai/Malay border region this morning - 3 killed, 22 wounded

Motorcycle bomb in southern Thailand market kills 3, more than 20 wounded

BANGKOK: A motorcycle bomb killed three civilians and wounded 22 others on Monday (Jan 22) morning at a market in Thailand's insurgency-hit south, officials said, the first such attack on a "soft target" in the Muslim-majority region for months.

A rebellion against Thai rule in the culturally distinct Thai "Deep South" bordering Malaysia has left nearly 7,000 dead - the majority civilians - since 2004.


The death toll in 2017 from the insurgency was the lowest in 13 years of conflict as peace talks edged forwards and the Thai junta boosted its security lockdown on the region.

But Monday's bomb at a packed market in Yala town popular with Buddhists and Muslims suggests a return to attacks on civilian targets.

Chunks of torn corrugated roofing and parts of destroyed motorbikes and stalls littered a narrow alleyway in the market, as police picked through a scene of devastation shortly after the bomb.

"The suspects parked the motorcycle in front of a stall selling pork in downtown Yala ... it detonated 10 minutes later killing three civilians and wounding 19 others," the policeman told AFP, requesting anonymity.

"It's the first big attack in downtown Yala in two years and is quite serious because people died."

It was not immediately clear if the bomb deliberately targeted the pork stall - and potentially its Buddhist customers.

The wounded were taken to the main hospital in Yala, which is the main town of the province with the same name.

Pramote Prom-in, an army spokesman for the region, confirmed the death toll, adding 22 were wounded "mainly with minor injuries".

Thailand, which colonised the ethnically Malay south roughly a century ago, has for decades been confronted by ethnic fighters seeking more autonomy, but the conflict flared up into its bloodiest phase in 2004.

Rights groups have accused both the insurgents and security forces of widespread human rights abuses.

The shadowy militant cells, who operate from remote communities and the forested Malaysia border zone have in recent months stepped back from targeting civilians amid heavy criticism.

Monday's attack could mark a dangerous new turn in the tactics.

"If it was the work of the insurgents, then it's a sign of things to come - a stern message to the authorities that they will resort to hitting soft targets," Don Pathan, a Thailand-based independent analyst, told AFP.

Pathan speculated the market blast could be "retaliation" for a specific incident in a conflict defined by tit-for-tat operations by insurgents and security forces.

"But over recent years the insurgents haven't targeted civilians out right ... this is a big concern."


Alexander Downer and Bill Clinton's cosy no-tender-necessary deal

This is the Honourable Alexander Downer.


And here he is with Bill Clinton in Sydney on 22 February 2006.

Screen Shot 2016-09-09 at 5.17.21 pm

Screen Shot 2016-09-09 at 5.08.02 pmScreen Shot 2016-09-09 at 5.08.15 pm

Screen Shot 2016-09-09 at 5.13.18 pm

Bill was unwell.

Screen Shot 2016-09-09 at 5.14.26 pm


In July 2006 a Funding Agreement was signed between the government of Australia and CHAI

1 August 2006 - start date of the PNG Contract as per the Evaluation Report

Screen Shot 2016-09-09 at 5.25.11 pm

14 August 2006 - purported start date of the contract according to Austender*.

The AUSTENDER website is responsible for publishing contractual events as soon as practical after each occurrence.

While the website records the contract as starting on 14 August 2006, Austender did not have any advice from the contracting agency, DFAT to publish the contractual details until 3 years later.  That's a very untidy arrangement, leaving lots of room for allegations about backdating etc.

On or about 20 August 2006 a notice, purporting to be a bona fide invitation to tender for the contract already awarded to the Clinton Foundation was published to the DFAT website.

Inviting tenders for a contract that has already been given meets the criminal points of proof for Obtaining a Financial Advantage (for self or another) by Deception.

It's a cover up, something that is not what it purports to be.

On the papers it appears a pretence was made at advertising a call for tenders after the contract, in whatever form it originally took had been awarded.  If this was a construction company run by a mate of the Minister it would be investigated on the spot.  It's clearly deceptive conduct.  If the Clinton Foundation received a financial advantage (clearly it did in a $15M uncontested contract) the people who did the deceiving will be in the frame for fraud charges, ie those responsible for the overall decision to defy the process by improperly awarding the Clintons work they weren't entitled to.

ON 20 August 2006 the US organisation visited the DFAT website and archived a precise and perfect duplicate of what it displayed on that day.

The links still operate

Current Tenders

Tender documentation can be obtained by clicking on the tender title, or by contacting the officer nominated in the tender summary.


Screen Shot 2016-09-10 at 1.29.15 am

In September and March Australian Government departments must publish to their websites details of all contracts entered into or extant during the preceding 6 month period.

Here is the AUSAID contracts list published around April 2007 covering the entire 2006 calendar year - the Clinton Foundation PNG contract was not published.

Here's the 2007 list, the project was published there with an end date of 2009 and a valued of $10.2M

Screen Shot 2016-09-10 at 2.10.35 am

On 11 October 2007 a genuine tender for the final Evaluation Report on the Clinton Foundation work was published to the Austender website.

Note the 4 extensions to the end date for the Clinton HIV/Aids project.

Screen Shot 2016-09-10 at 1.24.09 am

These are the 14 tenderers:

Screen Shot 2016-09-10 at 1.25.49 am

On 8 May 2009 the details of the contract awarded to the successful tenderer were published.

Screen Shot 2016-09-10 at 2.17.30 am


*On 15 July 2010 the contract details in what purports to have been an open competitive tender for the CHAI in PNG were published.

Screen Shot 2016-09-09 at 5.29.14 pm


If Alexander Downer had handed a contract to a family member in circumstances like this there'd be hell to pay.

But somehow it's been OK to hand multi-million-dollar deals (in fact donations) to the Clintons. 

A very cosy arrangement.

Screen Shot 2018-01-19 at 8.43.24 am

Fox launches 7 part series "Scandalous" - on Monica Lewinsky and Bill Clinton's impeachment and disbarment for perjury

Letter accompanying my 1st criminal complaint to the FBI re Clinton Foundation and Australian taxpayer funded donations



Director Christopher Wray

Director - FBI

FBI Headquarters

935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20535-0001



Dear Director Wray,

I write to report apparently serious criminal offences committed by US nationals and others involving the Clinton Foundation.

Since 2006 the Clinton Foundation has directly solicited more than AUD $88 Million in taxpayer-funded donations from the Australian Government.

I will allege that most of those donations were obtained as a result of a scheme to defraud Australian taxpayers. I will further allege that several Australian political figures sought benefits for themselves as a result of the provision of taxpayer donations to the Clinton Foundation. 

I have a number of matters to report to you - each by separate copy.

This is the first of those reports.

I now formally report to you, by way of criminal complaint, the offences disclosed in the following conduct commencing on 22 February 2006.  

I respectfully request that the FBI further investigates these criminal complaints, namely

  • William J CLINTON's false and misleading claims regarding his relationship with the Clinton Foundation
  • The backdating of the purported merger agreement between the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton HIV/Aids Initiative Inc and associated crimes
  • The illegal conduct of the Clinton Foundation and its associates in Papua New Guinea, including the apparent corruption of public officials.


The 2006 $25M MoU

On 22 February 2006 the Australian Government’s Department of Foreign Affairs (DFAT) reported in a statement:

The Australian Government and the William J. Clinton Foundation have joined forces.  The Minister for Foreign Affairs, Alexander Downer, and former President of the United States, Bill Clinton, signed a Memorandum of Understanding which will provide $25 million from Australia over four years. This figure will be complemented by a similar amount from the Clinton Foundation. 

Initially, the partnership will fund activities in three countries – Papua New Guinea,Vietnam and China. The Clinton Foundation and AusAID will work together with public health authorities to scale-up treatment and care for people living with HIV/AIDS. This will include availability of antiretroviral drugs, improving laboratory and testing infrastructure, and strengthening monitoring and evaluation systems.

William J CLINTON signed the document over the words “For the William J Clinton Foundation HIV/Aids Initiative,”.

In a statement (emailed to me) DFAT advised that Clinton executed the agreement as the “Founder” of the Clinton Foundation.

Clinton was never the “founder” of the Clinton Foundation which was incorporated in 1997, nor of the Clinton HIV/Aids Initiative Inc.  For at least 5 years from 2001 Clinton was prohibited from holding a number of legal and/or trustee positions on account of his disbarment following dishonesty convictions in US courts.  Clinton held no role and had no fiduciary responsibility for the Clinton Foundation or CHAI until 2013

Notwithstanding those facts, Clinton signed his name to a document that stated amongst other things “William J Clinton has made the global battle against HIV/Aids a major area of focus for his foundation”. 

During the ceremony to mark the signing of the MOU, Clinton spoke as the decision-maker wholly responsible for the performance of the Clinton Foundation.  He held no such role and while he may have been confident in his ability to influence the Board of the Clinton Foundation - his statements about control and establishment of the Clinton Foundation were false, misleading and had the effect of engendering unwarranted confidence in what turned out to be a false narrative concerning the Foundation's ability to deliver on its agreements.

As a result of the representations made in the MOU, the Australian Government subsequently established contractual/financial agreements with the Clinton Foundation HIV/Aids Initiative in respect of PNG, Vietnam, China and Indonesia and donations totalling more than $25M were transmitted to the Clinton Foundation or other entities associated with it.

While Clinton's false representations in soliciting donations represent serious criminality, my investigations in this matter have disclosed other serious crimes involving Clinton and the Foundation.

The conduct includes back-dating documents, forgeries and false and misleading statements made to the IRS in connection with a purported 31 December 2005 merger between the Clinton Foundation and a separate legal entity, the Clinton HIV/Aids Initiative Inc.

Following the 22 February MOU and the signing of a funding agreement in respect of PNG, I have also detected significant criminal activity involving public officials and others in connection with the incorporation of a Clinton Foundation entity in PNG in 2006.

It may be helpful to establish a timeline: 

History and timeline - the Clinton Foundation and CHAI Inc

On 23 October 1997 the William J Clinton Presidential Foundation was registered as a domestic non-profit corporation in the State of Arkansas. 

On 23 December 1997 the Foundation successfully applied to the IRS for exemption from taxation under 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.  The “Clinton Foundation” was thus founded, established, organised and licensed to operate as a public charitable foundation to build, house and operate a Presidential Archival Depository.  William J Clinton was not an officer, trustee, director or manager of the Foundation at any time until 2013.

On 24 March 2004 the Clinton Foundation HIV/Aids Initiative Inc was incorporated in the State of Arkansas, although it was headquartered in Quincy, Massachusetts.  On the same day it applied to the Secretary of State, Massachusetts for registration.

On 29 April 2004 the CHAI applied to the IRS for exemption from taxation in order to conduct its program focussed on treatment for HIV/Aids, with particular focus on the supply of cut-priced pharmaceuticals.

On 4 May 2004 Massachusetts regulatory authorities recognised CHAI as a foreign corporation and licensed it to operate in that state.  Apparently in anticipation of a favourable IRS ruling, the CHAI commenced to distribute HIV/Aids pharmaceuticals and other HIV/Aids treatments without any provision for taxes.

During 2004 the Clinton HIV/Aids Initiative Inc brought in revenues of $5.8M.  It had staff salaries of $800K along with a massive travel bill of $2.3M.

The CHAI Inc continued to operate throughout 2005 - in its 2005 financial report, CHAI disclosed $15.8M in revenues along with agreements with "20 new countries, giving (those countries) access to the Initiative’s reduced pricing” for HIV/Aids pharmaceuticals.

The Clinton Foundation’s 2005 report noted 


In December 2005 the CHAI was apparently advised by the IRS that its application for exemption from taxation had been refused. The refusal was a surprise and a most unwelcome one. Once final, it meant CHAI's authority to operate would have been removed. 

(In Federation Pharmacy Services, Inc. v. Commissioner, 625 F.2d 804 (8th Cir. 1980), aff’g 72 T.C. 687 (1979), the appellate court held that a nonprofit pharmaceutical service was not exempt as a charitable organization because it was operated for the substantial commercial purpose of providing pharmacy services to the general public).

On 22 February 2006 Clinton signed the MoU with the Australian Government for and on behalf of the Clinton HIV/Aids Initiative.

On 31 May 2006 Ira Magaziner, Chairman of the CHAI signed a State of Massachusetts “Form PC”, Annual return for charities.  He declared “Under the penalty of perjury” that the information in the return was true and correct.  No mention was made of the CHAI being merged or liquidated.

On 9 June 2006 the accounting and audit firm BKD LLP of Little Rock Arkansas wrote to the Board of Directors, William J. Clinton Foundation LLC Inc. enclosing annual financial and audit report for the calendar year 2005.  No mention was made of any merger with the CHAI noted as a separate legal entity.  At the same time the same firm completed a Form 990 annual IRS return for the Clinton Foundation.

On 24 July 2006, 6 weeks after the 2005 audit was finalised, Clinton Foundation CFO Andrew Kessel told the IRS in writing the Foundation would be unable to comply with a 15 August deadline for the submission of its annual Form 990 financial return.  He signed a written statement “subject to the penalties of perjury” stating a 3 months extension on the due date was needed "to accumulate the information necessary to file a complete and accurate return", taking the due date out to 15 November 2006.  The application for extra time was assessed by the Field Director for Submissions to the IRS at its Ogden Branch. 

Kessel submitted a similar sworn application on behalf of the CHAI.

On 31 July 2006 the Australian Government’s Department of Foreign Affairs (DFAT) executed an $11M funding agreement with the CHAI for HIV/Aids programs in Papua New Guinea.

On 14 August the IRS Field Supervisor approved the Clinton Foundation’s 3 month extension of time for its Form 990 annual return - making it due on 15 November 2006 - along with an instruction to include the application and approval for the extension in the 990 return. 

On 21 August, 2006 one Ruby SHANG (then the wife of the Caterpillar earthmoving dealer in Vietnam, a US citizen) gave notice to the PNG companies regulator that she intended to apply for incorporation for and on behalf of the "William J. Clinton Foundation HIV/Aids Initiative - PNG".  Ms Shang made a statement to the PNG Registrar of Companies stating that she was authorised by the committee of the said association to make the application.

On 23 August 2006 a Notice appeared in the PNG national newspaper “Notice of intention to apply for incorporation of an association” called “Clinton Foundation HIV/Aids Initiative - PNG”.  PNG legislation required 30 clear days from the advertisement of intention to incorporation before the regulator could consider the application.

On 23 August 2006 Ruby Shang attended on the PNG Registrar with an unsworn statutory declaration form and a clipping from the newspaper advertising her intention to apply under Section 2 of the Incorporated Associations Act for the incorporation of the CHAI Association PNG Inc.

At 8.38AM on 24 August 2006 Ruby Shang delivered to the Regulator a copy of the Clinton Foundation's articles of association filed in the State of Arkansas in 1997.   The articles bear no relationship to the requirements of the PNG Incorporated Associations Act which calls for specific matters to be addressed in the rules/objects of PNG incorporated associations.

At 10:03AM on 24 August 2006 the 'Clinton Foundation HIV/Aids Initiative - PNG Inc' was unlawfully incorporated.  There had been no 30 day cooling-off period (as required by law), no PNG existing association to incorporate, no proper rules/objects filed and a range of other deficiencies.  At the US end Ruby Shang is not nominated on IRS filings as a responsible person for the organisation, operation and control of an offshore offshoot of the Clinton Foundation.

Up until this point in 2006 the Clinton Foundation and Clinton HIV/Aids Initiative Inc were operating as separate legal entities.  There had been no announcement regarding any merger.  Each entity operated with its own Federal Employer Identification Number, bank accounts and premises.

On 27 October 2006 - the Clinton Foundation IRS 990 for 2005 was printed and date-stamped.

On 6 November 2006 - Clinton Foundation 2005 IRS 990 date stamped as filed with the IRS at Ogden.  The version filed with the IRS includes documents entitled “Articles of Merger” and “Plan of Merger” which purport to have been agreed by the Board of the Clinton Foundation on 25 April, 2005 - and by the Board of CHAI Inc on 15 December 2005.  Those documents describe a merger of the CHAI and the Clinton Foundation effective at 31 December 2005, with the CHAI having ceased to exist on that date and only the Clinton Foundation continuing as the surviving entity.

On 13 November 2006 - the Clinton Foundation HIV/Aids Initiative Inc IRS990 for 2005 was filed at Ogden.  It contains similar documents to those in the Clinton Foundation filing regarding the purported merger.

On 20 December 2006 - a different copy of the Clinton Foundation IRS 990 for 2005 was printed and time-stamped for display online at the Clinton Foundation website under the heading 

The Clinton Foundation is committed to transparency and accountability throughout its work. This page includes the Foundation’s annual reports, audited financials and annual tax filings, tax-exempt status filings and certifications.

The version of the 990 exhibited at the Clinton Foundation website differs materially from the actual 990 filed with the IRS.  It does not contain the merger agreement.  It contains a redacted purported donor list. There are no CHAI 990 IRS returns exhibited at the Clinton Foundation website at all.

During 2006-2007 - the Clinton HIV/Aids Initiative Inc continues to operate with its IRS recognised Federal Employer Identification Number 20-0921629 - quite separate from the Clinton Foundation 31-1580204.

CHAI continued to feature on the Clinton Foundation marketing material as a separate "initiative" or division.  The entity continued to operate wholly separately with its own premises at Water Street, Quincy MA.

On 31 December 2007 - CHAI Inc was dissolved by the Secretary of State, Massachussets. 

Mr Howard Cutter of the Massachusetts Secretary of State’s office wrote to me to advise “The entity (CHAI Inc) was dissolved by our office for failure to file annual reports in consecutive years”.

Had the merger taken place on 31 December 2005 as the backdated documents in the IRS 990 filings suggest, there would have been no CHAI to dissolve.  

Corporate regulatory authorities in the State of Arkansas seem to have been more helpful to the Clintons and associates.  The Arkansas authority records show the CHAI Inc's status as "merged".

There are several reasons to believe the purported Clinton Foundation & Clinton HiV/Aids Initiative Inc merger documents were false and backdated. 

Australia’s July funding agreement in respect of Papua New Guinea was with the CHAI as recorded on the Austender website - the purchasing management division of the Australian Government and a stickler for correct contracting entities..

During the whole of 2006, no advice was given nor announcement made that the CHAI Inc had ceased to exist as a result of a merger into the Clinton Foundation purportedly executed on 31 December 2005.

The Clinton Foundation’s external accountants and auditors prepared an Audit Report in June 2006 for the Clinton Foundation's 2005 year.  It doesn’t mention what would have been the material matter of any merger.

On 31 May 2006 CHAI Inc Chairman Ira Magaziner submitted a financial report to Massachusetts charity regulators on pain of perjury for false or misleading statements - he didn’t mention any merger.

Prior to October 2006, there is no verifiable evidence of any merger - nor of any agreement to merge the entities.

The two 3 month extensions of time (to 15 November 2006) to submit 2005 IRS 990 returns for each of the Clinton Foundation and the CHAI Inc would have been wholly unnecessary if the merger had taken place as described.  Kessels wrote (under the pain of a perjury conviction for which he may yet be called to account) that the extension of time was necessary in order to gather information to complete an accurate return.  Had the merger taken place on 31 December 2005, each entities financial position would have been accurately stated on that date, obviating the necessity for more time that August.

The Clinton Foundation itself was not authorised by the IRS to conduct any business in the distribution of HIV/Aids treatments.  The apparent refusal of the IRS to grant the CHAI tax exempt status was the trigger for a chain of events over several months which created substantial problems for the two entities.  Apparently persons associated with Clinton and Magaziner decided the solution was to pretend that the CHAI Inc had been dissolved and merged into the Clinton Foundation in 31 December 2005.  That deception left Australia exposed to contracts with a ghost corporation.

All of the foregoing might have been of less interest had the CHAI delivered value for the Australian taxpayer funded aid dollars donated to it.  In that regard it's useful to consider the audit report of the CHAI PNG performance.

Performance of the PNG contract

The biggest contract under the $25M MOU was the Clinton Foundation HIV/Aids Initiative PNG - all up Australia gave the Clintons about $15M earmarked for PNG between 2006 and 2009.

Recall that the CF was supposed to "complement" Australian funding by making its own contribution.

We put in $15M odd cash but according to the audit report,

"CF has contributed paediatric ARVs, paediatric OI drugs, commodities for the Early Infant Diagnosis Program (e.g. reagents, equipment including PCR machine) totalling US$417,622 USD as of June 2009".     

The audit report is here: 

Here are some direct quotes:

  • assessment of value for money has not been possible due to insufficient financial information in project reporting
  • the inadequacy of project documentation has quite significantly affected the ability to undertake a systematic evaluation of the project.
  • inadequate outcome indicators against one consistent set of objectives limits the extent to which there can be an acceptable discussion about effectiveness.

The Audit noted the project had

  • no statement of project goal or purpose,
  • no clear Program Area objectives and
  • no targets

The auditors noted:

A Funding Agreement was signed in July 2006 between the government of Australia and CHAI. This outlined the terms and conditions of the arrangement between AusAID and CHAI for the implementation of CHAI in PNG. This agreement states that “the parties agree to monitor the Program against the Program Milestones and evaluate it against the Program Outcomes.” The defining document against which this occurs is the Program Workplan 2006- 2009. As noted above there is no stated objective/outcome in this document (or any documents subsequent to this) for the whole project (and associated indicators). Outcomes or objectives for each of the AoC are not articulated (thus no indicators provided). It is therefore impossible for this part of the agreement to be adhered to.

the overarching goal/purpose/objective of the CHAI was never clearly articulated, and thus no indicators to measure its achievement have been presented in any project documentation. 

In the absence of a clear statement of objectives at the overall project level, and objective statements without indicators at the Program Area level it is not possible to say with any degree of confidence whether CHAI has been effective. 


Director Wray, I retain copies of each of the originating documents that support any assertion of fact made in this report to you.  I can provide you with statements regarding the chain of custody and provenance of those  documents.

I believe that serious cross-border criminal offences are disclosed in the conduct I report to you.  I will be pleased to provide you with any further assistance in bringing the offenders to justice.

Yours sincerely,

Michael Smith

An insight into why no charges have been laid in Victoria over the Gillard AWU Scandal. Yet.

These pages are from the most recent annual report of Victoria's Office of Public Prosecutions.

Screen Shot 2018-01-18 at 5.37.55 amScreen Shot 2018-01-18 at 5.37.55 am

Screen Shot 2018-01-18 at 5.37.55 am

Yes John Cain Jr - now the man responsible for deciding what cases go to court and what crooks can walk away.

With their 90% conviction metric it's now apparently the OPP rather than juries who decide guilt and innocence.

Must have been painful for John to read Bernard Murphy's notes taken at the time of the Murphy/Cain discussions on Wilson and the AWU crimes.

Cain knew about the secret commissions, the notes show that clearly.


Screen Shot 2018-01-18 at 5.37.55 am
Screen Shot 2018-01-18 at 5.37.55 am

Screen Shot 2018-01-18 at 5.37.55 am