One of Pfizer's other little known products is a jab that protects the user against Ethics and Morals.

Staff get a discount.

Haven't we all been duped?

Pfizer helped knock my Dad off 6 months ago and 3 others in his nursing home. All died of a lung infection they caught 4 weeks after getting their 2nd Pfizer shot. While not causing the problem, it's obvious that the jabs affected their immune systems (that's what the jabs do) enough, that they couldn't fight the non covid lung infection they caught.

I'm unvaxxed & a heavy guy and I got covid symptoms on Australia Day. Apart from a nasty headache on the 2nd day, it was mild.

Amazing what fear and marketing ( and really dumb politicians) can achieve, given they are flogging a poorly tested, leaky, dangerous chemical cocktail that does not work against the latest variant of Covid !

Alex Berenson released a very disturbing report recently that exposes Pfizers vaccine as a dangerous failure.

A mistake often made by people in general, and by media financial journalists, ABC for example, Greens another example of the trend, is to look at revenue and not profit before tax.

When operating costs of a business including research and development expenditure in this example, patent applications worldwide and related limited monopoly on a product, losses from R&D projects that did not succeed, and more, are accounted for what is left is taxable profit.

And another point regarding pharmaceutical drugs etc., I was recently prescribed a drug developed and produced by Pfizer and it cost me just over A$40 for 60 tablets, it would have been less if I was an age pensioner. I was checking for information about the drug for my own peace of mind, and I do trust my GP but wanted to check if there could be an adverse reaction with foods or supplement vitamins. For US customers the cost is close to US$600 for 60 tablets!!!

The Australian Commonwealth Department of Health pharmaceutical drugs purchase by tender and contracts in bulk really does benefit Australians, and no wonder US drug companies wanted it removed when the Free Trade Agreement was negotiated.

Of course Commonwealth Federal Government supplies those drugs to State Public Hospitals, pharmacies and others, another example of Federal and State areas of responsibility that look the same, Health Department, but are quite different when areas of responsibility and operations are considered. Like nursing homes, Federal responsibility shared with State Governments and for registration of a patient State Health Department clearance and rating is needed.

This is why pharmaceutical companies want to go after children and protect their profits. Their number one best seller. Didn't really understand why children were targeted until I saw this.

Robert Kennedy Jr.- If you want to know why there is such a strong drive to vaccinate children, you have to understand how the law works.

An EUA vaccine is protected from liability, but once it becomes an approved vaccine, the immunity shield disappears - UNLESS it is recommended for children.

Under the Childhood Vaccine Injury Act any vaccine that is recommended for children automatically receives immunity from liability even when the vaccine is given to adults.
https://gab.com/threesevens/posts/107762907488833987

Some would say that the profit motive allowed this company to capitalise on Covid and help human beings at the same time. I'd quibble.

I think no one needs that much money. The love of money is the root of all evil.

Big difference between revenue and profit - not that the ABC reporters understand the difference.

International travelers come into Wellness Camp .. but someone must be fibbing..love and light xx
https://youtu.be/Ym8sPqe_3i8

They reported earnings of $36 billion, but what they didn't report is that their vaccine has caused lifelong suffering to millions of people, and has killed hundreds of thousands, I wonder how many of their shareholders know that?

[Worth mentioning - that's sales, not earnings.

MPS]

This is one of the stories going around the convoy camp in Canberra and is being spoken about at rallies. I think in order quell fears our illustrious leaders should explain what the gadgets do, pipes etc. But as you say ethics and morals are in low supply so don’t imagine they will.

If any of this is true the rooms would be good to use on those who have sought to build them. Parliamentarians, builders etc

COVID QUARANTINE ROOMS
This guy takes us on a tour around the new Covid Quarantine gas chamber rooms being build for the jabbed and unjabbed. "A gas pipe that goes nowhere" tps://www.bitchute.com/video/h5YAhfI5guQl/

That’s Howard Springs.

Earnings or sales, either way it is still a lot of money, and the rest of what I said in my post doesn't change.

Okay so are the media lying with the images???

Why keep posting that misleading does not stop comment?

Nobody ever claimed that it would, vaccination offers protection meaning lowers the impact of the virus for vaccinated people.

Vaccination is not immunity and does not stop a carrier from passing the virus to others.

Vaccination protection is lower when a person has other medical issues as well as COVID-19 or variants.

Oxford Astra Zeneca vaccine has been available since early in December 2020 and here since early 2021, by now with all the information available there really is no excuse for not knowing the facts.

February 8, 2022
FDA Duplicity on Covid-19 Vaccines

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/02/fda_duplicity_on_covid19_vaccines.html

Nothing personifies this corruption more than the FDA’s absurdly close ties to the pharmaceutical companies. Thus, their refusal to recognize proven inexpensive therapeutics and their unorthodox approach in licensing certain Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 -- vaccines that are not offered for sale in the United States.

What was the FDA’s and the pharmaceutical companies’ endgame in this process? Was it to gaslight the American people in order to sell vaccines and achieve mass vaccinations? Was their motive to protect the pharmaceutical companies from exposure to liability and a tsunami of litigation? Was it so the FDA could more easily approve these vaccines for children who are not at risk of Covid-19? Or all the above?

In August of 2021, the FDA, to great media fanfare, granted permanent approval for a Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. The catch: it was for a vaccine that was not available to Americans. What the FDA approved and licensed is Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, not the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that has been continuously in use under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) since December of 2020. Manufacturers of medicines sold under an EUA are immunized from legal liability. \

The FDA decreed that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine should remain unlicensed and under the EUA but can be used interchangeably with the licensed Comirnaty vaccine. More importantly, the FDA stated that the Comirnaty vaccine and the existing vaccine are “legally distinct” and that there are slight differences in the vaccines, though their differences “do not impact safety or effectiveness.”

Moreover, the FDA acknowledged that there was no inventory of the Comirnaty vaccine available. Nearly six months later there is still no inventory available and will not be in the foreseeable future. Every vaccination with a Pfizer covid vaccine has been and continues to be with the one under the EUA.

Not to leave Moderna out in the cold, the FDA on January 31, 2022, granted permanent approval for a Moderna mRNA covid-19 vaccine. But not the one in continual use since December of 2020 under the authorization of an EUA. This approval was for Moderna’s Spikevax Covid-19 vaccine.

EUA products are considered experimental under U.S. law. Federal regulations provide that no one can force a person to participate in being jabbed with an experimental vaccine-- 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A) “Authorization For Medical Products For Use In Emergencies.” Potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines nor can they be denied a job or an education because they refuse to be vaccinated. However, U.S. law permits employers, schools, and government agencies to require employees and students to take licensed vaccines.

What better way to coerce the populace into acquiescing to mandates and societal pressure than to play the shell game of obfuscating the licensing of the covid vaccines? The vast bulk of Americans would assume the approval was for the vaccines in current use.

There is no FDA licensed and approved Covid-19 vaccine available in the United States today, thus any vaccine mandate is technically illegal.

t is little wonder that both the pharmaceutical companies and the government bureaucracies are focused on liability and not the efficacy or the hazards associated with these vaccines. They are caught up in a web of deception, venality, and potential legal exposure, therefore they can never admit to their mistakes. Thus, they continue to promote mass vaccinations and by necessity denigrate therapeutics such as Ivermectin.

To use a Quote

"If contraceptives had similar efficacy to Covid ‘vaccines’ they would have been withdrawn at warp-speed."

Extracted - "A further 4,458 cases were confirmed among the partly vaccinated, and 55,697 cases were confirmed among the unvaccinated. But with 17,350 cases now confirmed among the triple vaccinated this proves that it doesn’t matter how many jabs you get, they simply will not do anything to prevent infection or transmission of Covid-19.

This means that between 26th Nov 21 and 8th Jan 22, the vaccinated population accounted for 88% of Covid-19 cases in NSW, Australia."

That is another article based on deception, it has never been claimed that vaccinated people would be immune, or would not need hospital care.

It has always been stated that vaccinated people are more likely to survive the virus than unvaccinated people, and not need Intensive Care Unit admission, and be exposed to the high risk of the virus damaging lungs, heart and/or other and result in long term future medical problems.

Just recently I checked if with my medical history a booster would be worthwhile considering the latest omicron strain of the virus and I was assured that it was recommended. I have double vaccination already. My GP said that I cannot avoid omicron by getting a booster (I knew that) but reinforcing the two vaccinations will give me a higher level of protection if I catch omicron now, no booster and my risk is higher even though double vaccination still provides protection but diminishing over time and with due regard for the mutations.

It really is pathetic to maintain the rage that 90% at least of Australians do not have.

My view now is that unvaccinated people should be allowed to get on with their lives as they did before COVID.

After all, if they get the virus so be it.

The protection provided by vaccines is not binary. Vaccines offer better protection than nothing. The WHO has just approved a vaccine for malaria that is only 30% effective. Even at that low efficacy, it has the potential to save over 1 million lives per year.

From thedailyexpose opinion piece you linked:

“ This means that between 26th Nov 21 and 15th Jan 22, the vaccinated population accounted for 76% of all Covid-19 deaths, and it also proves that it doesn’t matter how many jabs you get, the Covid-19 injection simply won’t protect you against death, in fact it appears it may make your chances even worse. “

The vaccinated population is over 90% in NSW, and accounts for 76% of deaths. If vaccination made your chances worse, then over 90% of deaths would be vaccinated. In fact, the opposite is true. Maths is not a strong point with that author.

Why! do you think they will take the long road, do years of research and testing and only release a vaccine on to the market when it has been proven SAFE and efficacious?

OR

Will they duplicate research and get a vaccine on the market ASAP, TOUTING it is safe because the reality is that the bottom line is the dollar?

Frankly, actions and attitudes of many Australian scientific and medical personnel over the last two years have left me with the opinion they are little better than big pharma drug dealers!!

How do you know it is Howard Springs?
The sign on the outside it says the Queensland Regional Accomodation Centre.. wouldn't they all look the same..
Curious now if the media is lying or the other parties as there are many..love and light xx
Stopped it at .48 .. have a look at the filming does it looked edited and cropped to others as they go to each scene quickly, is it more propaganda (we know it is in reality to bring fear) but is it as Calculus says..
https://youtu.be/Ym8sPqe_3i8?t=48

They want to double that this year, that’s if they can keep suckering us.
I will work from home if I have to or lose my job as others have.
Funny I always said there would not be a pension when my time came.

The media will place misinformation everywhere.
You have to be ready to have some things disproved so the governments and media can say “look how stupid these right wing extremists are”.

Yep DenDen...get the booster!!......as I maintain, you autopsy findings may lead to the development of a REAL vaccine!

I’m all for not giving any money to big Pharma - but could the Aussies help us with a Kellogg’s Boycott, please.
I haven’t bought Kellogg’s for Decades - it’s crap & full of sugar.

I guess that they are looking for some cheap labor too.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/02/08/kellogg-foundation-bankrolls-500-monthly-income-for-illegal-aliens/