We've known this for years but it's somewhat comforting to see it gaining traction now.

Charles Ortel and I will soon meet with the opposition to set out the disgraceful fraud perpetrated on Australian taxpayers.

It's not that hard to understand.

The Clinton Foundation is facing renewed allegations of financial misconduct, including money laundering and misuse of funds, despite denials from Hillary and Chelsea Clinton. Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel insists there are significant reasons to further investigate, citing serious discrepancies in the foundation’s public filings.

Ortel points to deficiencies in the foundation’s filings, which remain non-compliant, even as the Clintons continue fundraising across state and national borders. Despite repeated investigations by the FBI, concerns over fraud have been dismissed by internet ‘fact-checkers,’ and federal probes have often been stalled or watered down, as highlighted in the 2023 Durham report.

Adding to the controversy, Chelsea Clinton’s claim that she did not profit from the foundation is now being challenged. Social media users have pointed to a substantial portion of the foundation’s expenses, including over $8 million for conferences and meetings, and nearly $2 million spent on travel.

Moreover, a leaked email from Bill Clinton’s former aide Doug Band raised eyebrows, suggesting that Chelsea had used foundation resources for her lavish wedding. The guest list for the event also raised suspicions, particularly the presence of Ghislaine Maxwell, who was associated with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein had close ties to the Clinton Global Initiative, sparking further questions about the foundation’s operations and its connections to powerful figures.

As the Clintons continue to dismiss these allegations as baseless, critics argue that the spotlight on the Clinton Foundation should not be dimmed, urging deeper scrutiny of its finances and activities.